The Impeachment Thread

#18,202
#18,202
For the 36th time...you can't have a Quid pro quo, bribery, or extortion if the other side is unaware. The Dems are counting on their army of low information voters and useful idiots to fall for their faux outrage when nothing was required of the Ukrainians to get their money. The day after the meeting Zelensky told Volker, Sondland, and Taylor that he was happy with the call. 20191114_092506.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, NorthDallas40, Orangeburst and 4 others
#18,203
#18,203
VolnJC said:
For the 36th time...you can't have a Quid pro quo, bribery, or extortion if the other side is unaware. The Dems are counting on their army of low information voters and useful idiots to fall for their faux outrage when nothing was required of the Ukrainians to get their money. The day after the meeting Zekensky told Volker, Sondland, and Taylor that he was happy with the call. View attachment 238259
Click to expand...

I'm so glad that these quotes are large enough for idiot Dims to read. But as it is so far......Dims have no understanding or the education ability of reading & understanding of words put on paper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF and VolnJC
#18,204
#18,204
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
I'm so glad that these quotes are large enough for idiot Dims to read. But as it is so far......Dims have no understanding or the education ability of reading & understanding of words put on paper.
Click to expand...
Don't sell them short they understand but it doesn't fit the narrative therefore it is not relevant. All of us do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF, NorthDallas40, VolnJC and 2 others
#18,207
#18,207
Either side attempting a victory lap after two witnesses is... premature, and likely an indication that the people doing the end zone dances aren’t really a reliable source of information or particularly significant to the purpose of the inquiry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#18,208
#18,208
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#18,210
#18,210
I caught my daughter getting a cookie before dinner once when she was 3. She put the cookie back when she saw me, but since she had broken a rule, I initiated a punishment of no desert that evening. At dinner, she came up with the genius idea to showing me how no cookies were missing from the cookie pack and therefore no crime had happened.

I saw you with your hand on the cookie, and the cookie going to your mouth, I said.

I just wanted to smell a cookie, she said.

No, you were about to eat that cookie, I said.

No I wasn't, she said. See all the cookies are here.

This, folks, is the exact same toddler logic the GOP case against impeachment rests upon right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ty4Vols, Mick and RockyTop85
#18,213
#18,213
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC and BigOrangeD
#18,216
#18,216
hUTch2002 said:
Bribery? I thought it was quid pro quo. No, wait...I thought it was extortion. I know, it was COLLUSION!
Click to expand...
Can you explain this narrative you’ve chosen? I don’t see how it makes any difference what it’s called.

The quid pro quo was witnessed by Vindman (and Fiona Hill?) admitted to by Sondland and Mulvaney, and testified to by Taylor. Taylor testified that they’d been thinking about leveraging White House visits since June and in September Sondland told him explicitly that they were withholding “everything” until the investigation was announced.

Why do you think it’s significant that, after establishing that the administration made an explicit quid pro quo (which is an element of solicitation of a bribe and is another word for extortion) the “prosecution” has telegraphed its intent to pursue the other elements of that offense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#18,220
#18,220
Pelosi is talking on TV right now about whatever is next to charge Trump with if this sham doesn't work.....
Dims need to tune in and find out the next boot licking demand that's coming up....:):)
 
#18,222
#18,222
RockyTop85 said:
Either side attempting a victory lap after two witnesses is... premature, and likely an indication that the people doing the end zone dances aren’t really a reliable source of information or particularly significant to the purpose of the inquiry.
Click to expand...
You presuppose something new will be revealed in the public **** show which was not covered in the private **** show. This is Washington DC and our awesome government you are talking about. Neither side can keep their damn mouth shut.

And now that I have time what was the inference you were trying to beat into my skull on VA/abortion?
 
#18,223
#18,223
NorthDallas40 said:
You presuppose something new will be revealed in the public **** show which was not covered in the private **** show. This is Washington DC and our awesome government you are talking about. Neither side can keep their damn mouth shut.

And now that I have time what was the inference you were trying to beat into my skull on VA/abortion?
Click to expand...
Except that the victory laps are all ignoring the private testimony.

“No first hand knowledge!!! Never talked to Trump!!!” None of that is going to hold up in the long run.
 
#18,224
#18,224
Rifleman said:
I caught my daughter getting a cookie before dinner once when she was 3. She put the cookie back when she saw me, but since she had broken a rule, I initiated a punishment of no desert that evening. At dinner, she came up with the genius idea to showing me how no cookies were missing from the cookie pack and therefore no crime had happened.

I saw you with your hand on the cookie, and the cookie going to your mouth, I said.

I just wanted to smell a cookie, she said.

No, you were about to eat that cookie, I said.

No I wasn't, she said. See all the cookies are here.

This, folks, is the exact same toddler logic the GOP case against impeachment rests upon right now.
Click to expand...
You heartless bastard! That poor oppressed little girl 😥
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top