volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 35,026
- Likes
- 61,265
I agree this is a problem. A huge one. I don’t know how comfortable I feel with our intelligence agencies listening in on any presidents phone calls. Their job isn’t to keep the president in check. That’s the other branches of governments job.It seems like the right is proactively trying to get out in front of this story now. There could be something to this rumor involving the Ukraine. We shall see.
He is desperate for reelection.
No. He is not the desperate one. The fact that any one would argue that Trump is desperate to defeat any of the knobs that will be running against him is totally blind to the current reality of American politics and why Trump is president now, and will be in 2020 again.
Agreed. It’s a grey area.In the second you didn't highlight "hiring". Hiring would infer something of benefit is changing hands. I would concede on some and argue on others. I've read several interpretations tonight since I was a bit off base, and I got a couple different reads. But, I would concede there is a very fine line there.
Yes. I'm going to remain skeptical that this is as explosive as it appears to be (no story is ever as juicy as when it first breaks - that is just how covering politics is these days), but I will return to my caveat... "If" the whistleblower is saying that Trump promised a shift in U.S. policy and aid to Ukraine in exchange for their targeting of Biden's son? That would be a high crime and impossible for Republicans to brush aside. That is bribery.Not a problem unless their is a quid-pro-quo.
AgreedYes. I'm going to remain skeptical that this is as explosive as it appears to be (no story is ever as juicy as when it first breaks - that is just how covering politics is these days), but I will return to my caveat... "If" the whistleblower is saying that Trump promised a shift in U.S. policy and aid to Ukraine in exchange for their targeting of Biden's son? That would be a high crime and impossible for Republicans to brush aside. That is bribery.
If you would have just said that Democrats have overreached on Trump scandals up until now, and they may do it again? I would agree with you. However, I think this is a legitimate question that should be answered: Did Donald Trump promise the President of Ukraine aid in exchange for pursuing allegations against Hunter Biden? The American people should be allowed to hear the answer to that question from the whistle blower.Based on current democratic practices, we may very well see another orchestrated hoax trying to frame Trump. They have yet to learn if they just walk away and leave him to his on vices he would probably do himself in. It’s the Samsung Democratic Party. The next big thing is here.
At this point nothing would shock me.
Current Fox News Presidential General Election Poll:No. He is not the desperate one. The fact that any one would argue that Trump is desperate to defeat any of the knobs that will be running against him is totally blind to the current reality of American politics and why Trump is president now, and will be in 2020 again.
My only question is how was the information obtained? Has that been addressed?If you would have just said that Democrats have overreached on Trump scandals up until now, and they may do it again? I would agree with you. However, I think this is a legitimate question that should be answered: Did Donald Trump promise the President of Ukraine aid in exchange for pursuing allegations against Hunter Biden? The American people should be allowed to hear the answer to that question from the whistle blower.
In the second you didn't highlight "hiring". Hiring would infer something of benefit is changing hands. I would concede on some and argue on others. I've read several interpretations tonight since I was a bit off base, and I got a couple different reads. But, I would concede there is a very fine line there.