Is it soliciting a foreign government to tamper with an election if Biden truly was doing something illegal?
We're in a huge gray area here.
Let's get real: Democrats were first to enlist Ukraine in US elections
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) delivered a pointed message to Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Murphy boasted after the meeting that he told the new Ukrainian leader that U.S. aid was his country’s “most important asset” and it would be viewed as election meddling and “disastrous for long-term U.S.-Ukraine relations” to bend to the wishes of Trump and Giuliani.
"I told Zelensky that he should not insert himself or his government into American politics. I cautioned him that complying with the demands of the President's campaign representatives to investigate a political rival of the President would gravely damage the U.S.-Ukraine relationship. There are few things that Republicans and Democrats agree on in Washington these days, and support for Ukraine is one of them," Murphy told me today, confirming what he told Ukraine's leader.
The implied message did not require an interpreter for Zelensky to understand: Investigate the Ukraine dealings of Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and you jeopardize Democrats' support for future U.S. aid to Kiev.
The Murphy anecdote is a powerful reminder that, since at least 2016, Democrats repeatedly have exerted pressure on Ukraine, a key U.S. ally for buffering Russia, to meddle in U.S. politics and elections.
So the whistleblower report was far more damning than I expected.
*If true*
There are so many abuses of power here, I'm not sure where to begin. For starters, for all Trump's talk about a "Deep State" against him, it would appear that he, in fact, manufactured his own deep state regarding Ukraine: Rudy. Rudy led a Trump-ordered quest to force Ukraine to get dirt on Biden. In effect, Rudy was his own "country" acting on behalf of the President - as his *personal attorney* - while our official State Department and other government employees were acting on behalf of the US. Ukraine was left in a quandary: Do we listen to Rudy or do we listen to the State Dept.? Why are we dealing with two different parties here? This shows that Trump was pursuing his own track for his own purposes, while using taxpayer money to force his will upon the Ukrainians.
GA Barr is another curious and potentially devastating factor in this equation: Clearly, he was involved with Trump's efforts for months. For Trump to claim that Barr is lily white and not part of these shenanigans is likely to prove completely false. Barr has already clearly demonstrated his unfettered adulation for Trump and his willingness to lie, steal and cheat for his ends.
There appears to be even more here once threads begin to pull. The fact that the WH was caught trying to cover this up from the get-go speaks volumes.
I'm now of the opinion that the House will definitely impeach Trump ultimately. We'll see through the course of the investigation just how low-down, rotten and corrupt that Trump really is, I suppose. Ask yourself: Does any of this really surprise you? Says alot about how far our Office of the Presidency has sunk.
Gonna be an ugly 3+ months while this onion peels away. Grab your popcorn.
Literally, how many times have the stooges on here ran with unsourced claims that "Trump will never survive; never!", just to slink away quietly a couple of days later when it blows up in their faces?The Dims know they can’t beat Donny in 2020 so they have to make sh!t up and get their media to brainwash the idiots that believes their garbage.
But we Patriots love watching you peasants go through your meltdowns. Please don’t stop.
So are you actually recommending the appointment of an IC to investigate the involvement of former Vice President Biden in this whole Ukraine issue?It’s a shame that in 243 years we haven’t developed any legal process for setting up an independent investigation that’s outside the influence of the president, that can be used in situations where the president’s involvement creates an appearance of impropriety.
They should really get on that. We could call it... independent counsel? That seems kind of obvious, maybe the special counsel.
It’s a shame that in 243 years we haven’t developed any legal process for setting up an independent investigation that’s outside the influence of the president, that can be used in situations where the president’s involvement creates an appearance of impropriety.
They should really get on that. We could call it... independent counsel? That seems kind of obvious, maybe the special counsel.
Yeah. Why wouldn't I? It beats the hell out of this mob boss banana republic **** show.So are you actually recommending the appointment of an IC to investigate the involvement of former Vice President Biden in this whole Ukraine issue?