ruger1234
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,129
- Likes
- 1,398
I agree that government is inept at most things. The wage of illegal workers that are vulnerable to be exploited is no where near the value in a free market. Therefore legal workers find themselves at a bargaining disadvantage.
It's not a free market if they ban workers from participating, and the presence of illegal workers doesn't compromise the freedom of the market so this statement doesn't make sense to me.
Legal workers and illegal workers don't work under the same protection of the law. Illegal workers can be exploited and cheated with little or no recourse.
It's no different than allowing two similar retailers to operate in the same city but only one is required to abide by the federal,state and local regulations.
Many illegals are paid each day in cash, that's hardly a level playing field.
No. I'm a disabled veteran. I have an only brother who owns a small dry cleaning business with six take in store fronts and the cleaning operation. I have done and occasionally still do some general office work for him. He pays his employees better than average and does ok but he's not wealthy.
I usually work for bourbon and beer.
Your turn.
.
No offense but you're kinda rambbling. I can't really pin down what your point is. You were talking about the free market and I responded and now you've completely abandoned that concept and wrote me 3 paragraphs about the concept of a level playing field.
Handing out pamphlets concerning jury nullification. Protesting road blocks. Those are the main activities at this point. What are you doing? Voting to make The Empire Great Again?
Level playing field = free market
Illegal workers and their employers work under different rules than legal workers and their employers.
Different rules = tilted playing field = rigged market
False
Both employers can hire illegal workers and all employees can work for low wages.
They're are all under the same rules, just some people break them and others don't.
Still don't understand what the point of all of this is. Are you advocating a policy change? Are you saying this relates to whether or not we should have a minimum wage increase?