The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[Septic]

The idea probably didn't cross your mind to ask directly.

I'm just saying.. You've got this legal twitter game on lock, you should offer your services to defense council.

When, inevitably, they're handcuffed for a rational response to Trumps bed shi**ing - you can whip out "Catturd" twitter and re-invent legal doctrine.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

I'm just saying.. You've got this legal twitter game on lock, you should offer your services to defense council.

When, inevitably, they're handcuffed for a rational response to Trumps bed shi**ing - you can whip out "Catturd" twitter and re-invent legal doctrine.

Everybody likes catturd tweets but loony leftist morons.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Septic]

Everybody likes catturd tweets but loony leftist morons.

Again, with the name calling.

Ad hom's are the last bastion of a failed argument.

If you can't get your point across without resorting to schoolyard personal attacks, then your argument probably wasn't worth making.

 

[Septic]

It would be outrageous to believe that the folks that brought us Jan 6th would try to intimidate or influence a potential witness.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Again, with the name calling.

Ad hom's are the last bastion of a failed argument.

If you can't get your point across without resorting to schoolyard personal attacks, then your argument probably wasn't worth making.

If you fit that description of a lefty loony moron it applies to you.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Talk about the name calling .... this is your favorite TV host ....

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Again, with the name calling.

Ad hom's are the last bastion of a failed argument.

If you can't get your point across without resorting to schoolyard personal attacks, then your argument probably wasn't worth making.

Thanks for playing today.

 

[OrangeBoro]

It is absolutely true: We have to wonder about the intelligence and mental stability of people who still support Trump. I mean, they are people who have just decided to ditch any ethical, law-abiding or patriotic principles they've ever purported to have.

Funny coming from a Biden boy

 

[OrangeBoro]

As I've said before, I've often wondered how Hitler was able to use propaganda to entice so many idiots to follow him.
We now have a perfect case study with you idiots that continue to follow and defend the orange man.

And we feel exactly the same about you people

 

[NurseGoodVol]

As I've said before, I've often wondered how Hitler was able to use propaganda to entice so many idiots to follow him.
We now have a perfect case study with you idiots that continue to follow and defend the orange man.

I’d like to see equal application of the law regardless of political party. That’s all I would ask for and all people should expect.

 

[Sudden Impact]

Nauta's name is probably on that witness list. This is going to get interesting. If it is this changes a lot.

 

[loggervol]

It would be outrageous to believe that the folks that brought us Jan 6th would try to intimidate or influence a potential witness.

Are you saying his accuser’s should stay anonymous? This is the same bs with Ukrainian call.

Only Supreme Court Justices should be intimidated. SMH

 

[Septic]

Are you saying his accuser’s should stay anonymous? This is the same bs with Ukrainian call.

Only Supreme Court Justices should be intimidated. SMH

His "accuser" is the United Stated of America.

Witnesses aren't accusers, they tell the truth under oath under penalty of perjury.

"smh"

 

[loggervol]

No, his accuser is the Democrat party. Hiding behind a corrupt doj.

I thought a witness list was supposed to be shared and anything the prosecution has, with the Defense attorneys.

 

[loggervol]

His "accuser" is the United Stated of America.

Witnesses aren't accusers, they tell the truth under oath under penalty of perjury.

"smh"

If they are saying you did something wrong. Yes, they are accusers. I think it comes from the word, accusation.

Until it’s been proven to be the truth. A witnesses testimony is accusations or allegations.

 

[Septic]

If they are saying you did something wrong. Yes, they are accusers. I think it comes from the word, accusation.

Until it’s been proven to be the truth. A witnesses testimony is accusations or allegations.

A witness is compelled to tell the truth irrespective of what they personally believe is "right" or "wrong." Thier personal opinions on the right are wrong are irrelevant.

The accuser is the United States of America - phone a friend dude, you're whiffing.

 

[Septic]

No, his accuser is the Democrat party. Hiding behind a corrupt doj.

I thought a witness list was supposed to be shared and anything the prosecution has, with the Defense attorneys.

It would have been in in either scenario, through discovery. The issue is on whether or not the list be made public.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Gandalf]

A witness is compelled to tell the truth irrespective of what they personally believe is "right" or "wrong." Thier personal opinions on the right are wrong are irrelevant.

The accuser is the United States of America - phone a friend dude, you're whiffing.

Eh, gotta think witness for the prosecution is pretty much an accuser. They are accusing the one in the dock. Don't play semantics here, you absolutely would say they were accusers if it were on the other foot.

 

[lawgator1]

To keep the Trump numbnuts from trying to intimidate the witnesses.

Have you noticed how vicious they are with the people that have simply worked for Trump in the past but now say he's a dangerous, incompetent, moron? Given that, can you imagine how they will treat the people he was showing classified documents to, about for example attacking Iran, and bragging about what a big shot he is to still have them? Those folks will be harrassed and threatened. For sure.

 

[Septic]

Eh, gotta think witness for the prosecution is pretty much an accuser. They are accusing the one in the dock. Don't play semantics here, you absolutely would say they were accusers if it were on the other foot.

Ehh. It's not semantics.

Words have meanings. The U.S. DOJ is the accuser and calls witnesses that are compelled to tell the truth, just as the defense does.

Suggesting that the witnesses are in cahoots as "accusers" is an attempt to vilify the messenger of the truth.

 

[BreatheUT]

It is absolutely true: We have to wonder about the intelligence and mental stability of people who still support Trump. I mean, they are people who have just decided to ditch any ethical, law-abiding or patriotic principles they've ever purported to have.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

To keep the Trump numbnuts from trying to intimidate the witnesses.

Have you noticed how vicious they are with the people that have simply worked for Trump in the past but now say he's a dangerous, incompetent, moron? Given that, can you imagine how they will treat the people he was showing classified documents to, about for example attacking Iran, and bragging about what a big shot he is to still have them? Those folks will be harrassed and threatened. For sure.

Sounds like you worshipped at the Altar of Merrick Garland this morning.

 

[loggervol]

A witness is compelled to tell the truth irrespective of what they personally believe is "right" or "wrong." Thier personal opinions on the right are wrong are irrelevant.

The accuser is the United States of America - phone a friend dude, you're whiffing.

It’s cute that you think any of these “witnesses” are worried about facing perjury charges. Or, are compelled to tell the truth when they know there will be no charges levied.