The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

You throw up a Trump Putin love fest..well you do realize pee tapes and all that were lies don’t you?
IMO, Trump had the meeting to get dirt on a Hills, something ever pol does, even with foreign sources. It blew up into just what you are still pushing..Russian collusion and your post.

So It seems that you still cannot let your lie go, but ask me to discount my hypotheticals as impossible.

what?

English please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
Trump was an ass as usual, but he did admit to having the documents and argued he had a right to them. That part is at least a bit murky when it should be a clear cut thing that no president has a right to classified documents once out of office. Biden, Clinton, Pence, and likely other politicians had no right to the documents, and no defense. For that reason I think the case against Trump is iffy, and clearly indefensible for Biden, Clinton, and Pence. The worst part (and what is routinely ignored) is that either nobody knew about the Biden documents for years, or it was deliberately covered up. That means a lot of stuff at U PA could have been accessed and acted on; that's a far worse compromise than anything else.
I think there are some differences between Trump and Pence/Biden. Pence and Biden said, "yeah, we may have inadvertently taken something we shouldn't have come look around take what you need." Trump said, "yeah, I inadvertently took some things here they are, I don't have anything else," then went and hid a bunch of stuff and had his lawyers say he didn't have anything else. At least that's my understanding.
 
Last edited:
I think there are some differences between Trump and Pence/Biden. Pence and Biden said, "yeah, we may have inadvertently taken something we shouldn't have come look around take what you need." Trump said, "yeah, I imadvertently took some things here they are, I don't have anything else," then went and hid a bunch of stuff and had his lawyers say he didn't have anything else. At least that's my understanding.

I do think that Trump did say some of that - I'd forgotten. I also believe I read that just about everybody claims that some staffer actually packed the file boxes to deflect blame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
I do think that Trump did say some of that - I'd forgotten. I also believe I read that just about everybody claims that some staffer actually packed the file boxes to deflect blame.
The day after the raid he claimed the documents were planted in a letter he wrote in Truth Social. Then it was that he declassified the documents.
 
Then how do you suggest handling the security issues by Clinton, Pence, Biden, ... ? Those don't even fall under the pretense of presidential privilege. Dems have a real bad habit of believing themselves intelligent, breaking new ground, and then finding themselves screwed by their own doing. I personally have no problem with finding Trump guilty (assuming it can be proven he wasn't covered by presidential privilege) just as soon as other politicians are treated the same as a member of the military would be.
The cases aren't remotely comparable
 

Donald Trump indictment: Fani Willis urges joint trial for 19 RICO defendants​


Prosecutors charging former President Donald Trump and 18 others over an alleged scheme to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia are calling for defendants to be tried in a joint trial, citing a need for fairness and efficiency.

The request comes as Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee could decide as soon as this week whether to allow two defendants in the sweeping racketeering indictment to head to trial on Oct. 23 and sever their case from 17 others, including Trump.


 
I do think that Trump did say some of that - I'd forgotten. I also believe I read that just about everybody claims that some staffer actually packed the file boxes to deflect blame.
 
Last edited:

Liberal Spank bank takes a hit.

I think you'd find that the left would like nothing more than to have these televised.

Despite the article you posted, federal courts have never allowed live TV. Your source is #fakenewsing you to invoke outrage.
 
Federal courts have never televised trials. At least that's what they said the rules were when the media started asking the courts to televise trumps trials. So I guess we are living under the rules.

I'll bet advertising time during the GA trial will be huge. I can't wait.
 
So I guess from your caviler attitude that you've never had a security clearance and have no idea why they even exist.
That's irrelevant of my post. And yes, I have and understand at least as well as you why they exist.
Pathetic deflection

Edit: I think we might be talking about 2 entirely different things here
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
I think you'd find that the left would like nothing more than to have these televised.

Despite the article you posted, federal courts have never allowed live TV. Your source is #fakenewsing you to invoke outrage.
"A rules-making body behind the U.S. federal court system, the Judicial Conference, issued a new rules on Tuesday saying that it will allow "judges presiding over civil and bankruptcy cases to provide the public live audio access to non-trial proceedings that do not involve witness testimony," according to a news release from the conference. However, it said that "the change approved Tuesday does not extend to criminal proceedings."

"The current rules for federal court proceedings prohibit video or photography inside courtrooms. That rule applied when the former president was arraigned earlier this year in two federal cases in which prosecutors allege that he tried to overturn the 2020 election and for allegedly mishandling classified documents after he left the White House."

"Temporary permission to conduct some criminal proceedings by videoconference or teleconference, which had been granted under the 2020 CARES Act, ended on May 10, 2023," the release also said. "Courts have already discontinued use of virtual criminal proceedings, except as otherwise authorized. The revision also does not affect a judge’s ability to allow parties and counsel to appear remotely by teleconference and videoconference."


Maybe read the article.

Back to ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
This thread reminds me of teenage drama. Two teenagers get in trouble , the parents of each blame the other's child.

Reality check both teenagers were willing participants and are turds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
So I guess from your caviler attitude that you've never had a security clearance and have no idea why they even exist.
Why make this personal, "caviler attitude" statement or with assumptions. Most military kids can figure why classifications of documents exists in the 2nd grade.
At present, we have no public details of the classified documents that Biden & Pence possessed. We may never know or we may. We do know what Trump did to keep his which is a crime in itself. They cooperated and Trump did not. So it is not comparable by the actions they took to resolve the crime.
Not sure if they will do anything to Biden or Pence but you need to get over what has been done to Trump.
You are throwing darts to protect your beloved criminal.
 
Why make this personal, "caviler attitude" statement or with assumptions. Most military kids can figure why classifications of documents exists in the 2nd grade.
At present, we have no public details of the classified documents that Biden & Pence possessed. We may never know or we may. We do know what Trump did to keep his which is a crime in itself. They cooperated and Trump did not. So it is not comparable by the actions they took to resolve the crime.
Not sure if they will do anything to Biden or Pence but you need to get over what has been done to Trump.
You are throwing darts to protect your beloved criminal.

Oh really or was that before or after they went after Trump to present the appearance of fairness and cooperation?

"Hey, look over here. We know y'all have classified documents and China Joe we know you've been in illegal possession for years but we want to go after Trump so we're going to make sure the appearance of cooperation exist so it makes us look cleaner. Normally we wouldn't care because we never really do this but we're looking for I gotchas." - signed crooked law enforcement
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol and AM64
Trump lies about everything, especially himself. Of course, you and your ilk continue to rationalize it with whataboutisms and deflections. I'll predict he'll write a book about how he conned your ilk
While you and your ilk fall MSM stories that have been proven false. Media manipulation of repeated stories and no consequences have dumbed down common sense of the left.
 

VN Store



Back
Top