The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#13,977
#13,977
VolTull said:
Then Emory is a joke which, btw, I personally know is a total lie. Can't have it both ways, 8188.
Click to expand...
I think he’s clearly insinuating 3 things here:

1. Fanni Willis was “let” into Emory Law
2. Fanni Willis was “passed through” Emory Law
3. Both of those happened because Fanni Willis is a black female
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#13,978
#13,978
VolTull said:
www.politico.com

Why Penn Won’t Talk About Donald Trump

As Trump becomes the university’s most famous alum, campus leaders scramble to protect its brand.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Click to expand...
lol what a bs hit piece

"Hardly an excellent student Trump never made the Dean's list"

So you are hardly excellent if you don't make the deans list? Makes the Deans list seem pretty unremarkable
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and hog88
#13,983
#13,983
VolTull said:
View attachment 620711
Click to expand...
Not really. The argument being put up was that clearly Fanni is a qualified lawyer bc she graduated from Emory. I asked if that thought process held true for Trump since he graduated from Wharton. Apparently it only counts if you get a law degree from Emory. No way that's questionable. But you can question trumps. Absurd piss poor argument. Trumps a clown. So is Fanni. Stop pretending she's qualified when her own words and actions prove she isn't. Trump isn't qualified to be potus IMO bc of his words and actions. Consistency.
 
#13,984
#13,984
85SugarVol said:
You don’t think Emory has/does taken steps to enhance its diversity?
Click to expand...
Of course they do but never ime at the cost of a superb academic program with stiff entry requirements This isn't Harvard or Yale or some snotty East Coast legacy-preferred school where you can buy in.
 
Last edited:
#13,985
#13,985
volfanhill said:
Trump graduated from one of the top business schools in the country. Can that be used to prove competence for him? Or nah just Fanni and Emory?
Click to expand...
🤭 Just shared an opinion about Emory. Why in the hell would you bring up Trump's academic background? Really? Please don't stupidly accuse people of having TDS. Thanks
 
#13,989
#13,989
VolTull said:
Of course they do but never ime at the cost of a superb academic program with stiff entry requirements This isn't Harvard or Yale or some snotty East Coast legacy-preferred school where you can buy in.
Click to expand...
What a weak attempt to spin to rich white kids getting legacy admissions into the Ivy League.

That has nothing to do with whether or not Emory had/has policies to get more diversity (through standards manipulation) into its ranks.

Just about every University out there, from UT to Harvard, has engaged in that (now illegal) practice.
 
#13,990
#13,990
85SugarVol said:
What a weak attempt to spin to rich white kids getting legacy admissions into the Ivy League.

That has nothing to do with whether or not Emory had/has policies to get more diversity (through standards manipulation) into its ranks.

Just about every University out there, from UT to Harvard, has engaged in that (now illegal) practice.
Click to expand...
Ok, you win. I lived and breathed Emory for years but you know better from all the way over there in Memphis. Tiger High graduate I assume.
 
#13,991
#13,991
Vol8188 said:
You should listen to her testimony is what I meant to type. I was in the sauna and my phone doesn’t do well there.

Seriously, listen to it. Donald Trump in black face. She attacks continually in a way most witnesses likely wouldn’t be allowed to, seems to not understand what it means when they call her a hostile witness and proclaims how kind she’s being, and even implicated herself in additional crimes.

I’ll find it and post the link if you need
Click to expand...
I think it would be a waste of time to watch only her testimony. An arrogant, probably-lying, self-righteous, law enforcement ******* is nothing new. If that’s all it took to make criminal prosecutions fall apart, the criminal court system wouldn’t get anything done.

The defense (trump side) had the burden of basically proving a unicorn and, from what I saw, the twitter cheerleaders were going wild over the hooves, the mane, the tail, and the pretty white coat.

I don’t really care who wins this case. It’s turned into a fist fight between Putin and Erdogan or a football game between Alabama and Florida. If they give the judge enough to wipe the smudge off the lens and there’s a horn underneath, oh well. If not, oh well. But law favors “not” and the odds favor Julie Karen et. al. blaming the judge when/if that is what happens.
 
#13,993
#13,993
VolTull said:
Ok, you win. I lived and breathed Emory for years but you know better from all the way over there in Memphis. Tiger High graduate I assume.
Click to expand...
Bwaaaa! You really think Emory wasn’t engaged in race based admissions?

Lol -

emorywheel.com

After Supreme Court bans affirmative action, Emory must double down on diversity | The Emory Wheel

While praise has been earned for Emory and its leadership, its students, community members and employees must also press for future consistency with its pledge for diversity in the face of an uncertain future for admissions.
emorywheel.com emorywheel.com

 
#13,995
#13,995
BernardKingGOAT said:
🤭 Just shared an opinion about Emory. Why in the hell would you bring up Trump's academic background? Really? Please don't stupidly accuse people of having TDS. Thanks
Click to expand...
please find my last post where I discussed TDS. I'm attacking the logic being used by you and others to defend Fanni. You can't use her education as proof of qualification if your aren't willing to concede Trump has business qualifications based on his. It's not difficult.
 
#13,999
#13,999
Vol8188 said:
She's amazingly combative from the beginning of her testimony, a few minutes in the prosecution mentions she's treating Fani as a "hostile witness" and she goes on a laughable tantrum about how nice she's not a hostile witness because "I am not a hostile witness. I very much want to be here".

ummm....how exactly did she graduate from law school. During her tantrum about how she's not hostile she even accuses the woman questioning her of opposing democracy...but hey...she's not hostile. Time stamp approx 5:40 until 5:54 in this video.

It only gets worse from there. While attempting to explain where the thousand's of dollars in cash she paid her boyfriend for fancy trips around the world (because if she didn't pay, it seems even more so like she gave him 600k so he could take her around the world) she seems to implicate herself in campaign fraud by saying she took money from her campaign and she left it laying around her house.

"Did you get the cash out of the ATM to pay him", "(shaking head no), I have cash in my house"
Time stamp approx 23:00 until 23:29 in this video.

At some points she admits to paying her rent through Cashapp. But she denies ever paying Wade using Cashapp. Instead every penny she gave him was in the form of cash. She even said "ma'am I don't have checks"? Lol what?

"So you don't have any reimbursement of any of things you paid him for because it's all cash right?"
Fani "The testimony of one witness is enough to prove a fact. Are you accusing me of lying to you? The proof is what I just told you".
Time stamp approx 46:30 until 48:00 in this video.

At the time when she says she was paying him thousands of dollars in cash, she had a tax lien against her home for a little over 4,000. Time stamp approx 48:30 until 49:30 in this video.

According to the author of her bio (I believe that's what they're quoting) she was "broke in 2018".



Click to expand...


You wasted your time Rt85 will just come back with an incoherent word salad defending his profession. Or he’ll just stay silent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, Vol since 77, davethevol and 1 other person
#14,000
#14,000
RockyTop85 said:
I think it would be a waste of time to watch only her testimony. An arrogant, probably-lying, self-righteous, law enforcement ******* is nothing new. If that’s all it took to make criminal prosecutions fall apart, the criminal court system wouldn’t get anything done.

The defense (trump side) had the burden of basically proving a unicorn and, from what I saw, the twitter cheerleaders were going wild over the hooves, the mane, the tail, and the pretty white coat.

I don’t really care who wins this case. It’s turned into a fist fight between Putin and Erdogan or a football game between Alabama and Florida. If they give the judge enough to wipe the smudge off the lens and there’s a horn underneath, oh well. If not, oh well. But law favors “not” and the odds favor Julie Karen et. al. blaming the judge when/if that is what happens.
Click to expand...

You seem to be apart of that problem yourself. I'm attempting to discuss the actual case and you're just repeating "MAGA real bad!", over and over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and W.TN.Orange Blood
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top