The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[Sudden Impact]

based on what?

His Deeds...He did sell Bibles, so that is a good one. Extra if Autograph...

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

His Deeds...He did sell Bibles, so that is a good one. Extra if Autograph...

Just when you thought Trump couldn't go any lower on the stoop scale, he puts the Bible up for sale.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Chuck Callesto
@ChuckCallesto

BOMSHELL REPORT: Accusations emerge that Michael Cohen was HAVING AN AFFAIR with Stormy Daniels since 2006 and that the "hush money scheme was cooked up by Michael Cohen to EXTORT THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION before the 2016 election"..

"Avenatti shared details of his client Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, case and the fact that her and Michael Cohen were actually having an affair since 2006." -Tony Seruga

SOURCE:
@TonySeruga
X

DEVELOPING: 2018 Letter re-emerges from Michael Cohen's attorneys admitting TRUMP KNEW NOTHING about the HUSH MONEY transaction..

These accusations that COHEN had an affair with Stormy Daniels since 2006 make much more sense now..

"Neither the Trump Organization or the Trump Campaign was a party to the transaction with Mrs. Clifford and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen directly or indirectly."

Pardon Me? Michael Avenatti Flips, Willing To Testify On Trump's Behalf

A person close to the former president confirmed the ongoing discussions.

While Avenatti made his name as one of Trump’s most ferocious critics — and even publicly called for Trump’s indictment in 2018 — the defense attorney sang a different tune from the clink.

“There’s no question [the trial] is politically motivated because they’re concerned that he may be reelected,” Avenatti said. “If the defendant was anyone other than Donald Trump, this case would not have been brought at this time, and for the government to attempt to bring this case and convict him in an effort to prevent tens of millions of people from voting for him, I think it’s just flat out wrong, and atrocious.

“I’m really bothered by the fact that Trump, in my view, has been targeted. Four cases is just over the top and I think there’s a significant chance that this is going to all backfire and is going to propel him to the White House,” he added. -NY Post

 

[dalton_vol]

34 Felony indictments and you are calling it a witch hunt. Try again. 1 or 2 I would call it a witch hunt as well, but 34 is what it is. 34 indictments all met the legal standards for charges.

You know as well as i do that they pull thise charges out of their butt. This is a complete banana republic trial..

 

[Jxn Vol]

I see a lot of spoiled child in you with lots of drama. No clear thought process and you. Can't sustain an argrument without insult or shifting blame.

I just call it like I see it. Sorry splinters.

 

[Jxn Vol]

I freely admit that errant post was 100% on me. The wrath I may see from it is well deserved.

Name the members of the uniparty. Where do they meet? Somewhere in the "deep state"? Is that out in Nevada? New Mexico?

They meet in Congress. They just approved 61billion to protect Ukraine and $0.00 for the US border. It’s right there if you open your eyes.

 

[volfanhill]

They meet in Congress. They just approved 61billion to protect Ukraine and $0.00 for the US border. It’s right there if you open your eyes.

So they can't vote for border funding ever again? Oh no

 

[lawgator1]

His undoing will be his testifying. He'll have to say point blank he did not know of the payment and literally no one will believe him.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Let me help. Trump is demented, Biden is age-ridden

lol. Trump isn’t close to being demented. You are saying this because so many have said Biden is. Typical deflection.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Ok, I'll bite.

How's she/it/him supposed to be spelled and why?

Spell it God. Why would anyone spell it G-d? That’s not even a real word. What do you mean why?

 

[Jxn Vol]

So they can't vote for border funding ever again? Oh no

They have multiple times. Ukraine’s that is. Uniparty does what they want and screws over the citizens of this country.

 

[BreatheUT]

There is no question that the trial will be rigged at every step. The outcome is certain. The only question is HOW rigged they can make it.

I think all of these things they are doing is to chip away and test the American people, especially ones that see these prosecutions as a farce. I think every time they go a little further and if enough people don't say enough is enough they go a little further the next time. I think today's democrats are some of the weakest people in the world but they use systems others have built to cause damage in favor of them to stay in power.

 

[newyorkvol]

His undoing will be his testifying. He'll have to say point blank he did not know of the payment and literally no one will believe him.

Not to butt in, but if he’s testifying under oath and point blank says he didn’t know of the payment, wouldn’t the bigger problem be that no one will believe him (jurors included)?

 

[Sudden Impact]

Hey fence rider, do your female parts full of splinters yet?

Oh and we appreciate your Uniparty Speaker for funding Ukraine again. This is the deal now. I’ve been saying it for a long time and it’s true. It’s the uniparty against the citizens. Even the ones that straddle the fence.

OBTW 3/4 of Congress voted for Ukraine Aid based on a CIA Intelligence briefing. I guess you know more about what is happening over there than the Agency... Must be a Pro Russian supporter in America. The Speaker did the right thing, and you are willing to set back and do nothing but criticize it. You have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. You will learn as you grow up.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

His undoing will be his testifying. He'll have to say point blank he did not know of the payment and literally no one will believe him.

He could say that it was set up that way to prevent personal and business embarrassment (i.e John Edwards) or to improve deductibility for tax purposes.

Those would actually help him....

The problem is he won't stay on script on the stand

 

[lawgator1]

Not to butt in, but if he’s testifying under oath and point blank says he didn’t know of the payment, wouldn’t the bigger problem be that no one will believe him (jurors included)?

Yes.

 

[85SugarVol]

He could say that it was set up that way to prevent personal and business embarrassment (i.e John Edwards) or to improve deductibility for tax purposes.

Those would actually help him....

The problem is he won't stay on script on the stand

Who in their right mind would put Trump on the stand? That is not happening lol.

 

[Sudden Impact]

His undoing will be his testifying. He'll have to say point blank he did not know of the payment and literally no one will believe him.

Trump will not testify and if he does this will spin into a complete annihilation of his character based on how far the Judge allows the Prosecution to go outside this "Hush Money" Trial.

 

[Gandalf]

OBTW 3/4 of Congress voted for Ukraine Aid based on a CIA Intelligence briefing. I guess you know more about what is happening over there than the Agency... Must be a Pro Russian supporter in America. The Speaker did the right thing, and you are willing to set back and do nothing but criticize it. You have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. You will learn as you grow up.

I wish this were the 80s where I still trusted the intelligence agencies to do dastardly things but have Americas best interests at heart.

But these are the same intelligence agencies that went for a soft coup against Trump, the same country that was paying off Biden.

Almost every dollar of that money that goes "to Ukraine" actually goes to our DOD to replenish its budget and our weapons contractors to pay for some weapons. It is solely a get rich scheme that half of Washington seems to be in on. There is no American interest here at all or our border would have gotten some money.

Meanwhile Ticktock - I dont care about that company but the new law was written to give the surveillance state almost UNLIMITTED access to every bit of data you have. Without warrant or provocation they can spy on Americans and more, cause OTHER Americans service providers to assist them.

This is simply the intelligence agencies lying through their teeth in order to grab more power for themselves.

 

[BreatheUT]

I wish this were the 80s where I still trusted the intelligence agencies to do dastardly things but have Americas best interests at heart.

But these are the same intelligence agencies that went for a soft coup against Trump, the same country that was paying off Biden.

Almost every dollar of that money that goes "to Ukraine" actually goes to our DOD to replenish its budget and our weapons contractors to pay for some weapons. It is solely a get rich scheme that half of Washington seems to be in on. There is no American interest here at all or our border would have gotten some money.

Meanwhile Ticktock - I dont care about that company but the new law was written to give the surveillance state almost UNLIMITTED access to every bit of data you have. Without warrant or provocation they can spy on Americans and more, cause OTHER Americans service providers to assist them.

This is simply the intelligence agencies lying through their teeth in order to grab more power for themselves.

Good post. The naivete never cease to amaze me. The total reliance on groups that have been found guilty of lying and infiltrated with partisans is puzzling.

 

[Jxn Vol]

OBTW 3/4 of Congress voted for Ukraine Aid based on a CIA Intelligence briefing. I guess you know more about what is happening over there than the Agency... Must be a Pro Russian supporter in America. The Speaker did the right thing, and you are willing to set back and do nothing but criticize it. You have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. You will learn as you grow up.

Splinters, 3/4 of Congress is Uniparty. The difference is my eyes are open to the 2 party anti American corruption. Your know it all schtick proves my point every single time. I hate to break it to you but the crew up there you support cares as little about you as they do me. Once your eyes are opened you will see it differently. But as it sits currently your big government blinders are securely installed. Thanks for letting me educate you.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Good post. The naivete never cease to amaze me. The total reliance on groups that have been found guilty of lying and infiltrated with partisans is puzzling.

The supporters of the Uniparty and their government agencies are like little children with horrible parents. They think their parents have their best interests and care for them. But they are too young, inexperienced, and ignorant to understand that they are in a terrible situation.

 

[hog88]

He could say that it was set up that way to prevent personal and business embarrassment (i.e John Edwards) or to improve deductibility for tax purposes.

Those would actually help him....

The problem is he won't stay on script on the stand

Is Trump testifying?

 

[hog88]

I wish this were the 80s where I still trusted the intelligence agencies to do dastardly things but have Americas best interests at heart.

But these are the same intelligence agencies that went for a soft coup against Trump, the same country that was paying off Biden.

Almost every dollar of that money that goes "to Ukraine" actually goes to our DOD to replenish its budget and our weapons contractors to pay for some weapons. It is solely a get rich scheme that half of Washington seems to be in on. There is no American interest here at all or our border would have gotten some money.

Meanwhile Ticktock - I dont care about that company but the new law was written to give the surveillance state almost UNLIMITTED access to every bit of data you have. Without warrant or provocation they can spy on Americans and more, cause OTHER Americans service providers to assist them.

This is simply the intelligence agencies lying through their teeth in order to grab more power for themselves.

I question the sanity of anyone who still trusts our intelligence agencies.

 

[lawgator1]

He could say that it was set up that way to prevent personal and business embarrassment (i.e John Edwards) or to improve deductibility for tax purposes.

Those would actually help him....

The problem is he won't stay on script on the stand

Exactly. And if the jury thinks he's lying they will reject anything else he says.