The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#19,676
#19,676
McDad said:
Would it be accurate to summarize your political stance on abortion as: the federal government simply shouldn't be involved in a medical procedure.
Click to expand...
Not to derail the thread, but I heard a podcast host posit this interesting thought that was derived from Justice Breyer’s new book: maybe we just shouldn’t incorporate unenumerated rights to the states (my paraphrased version). Then let them hash those things out democratically. The catch was that the right to bear arms outside the home for self defense would be considered an unenumerated right.

The next episode of the podcast had Akil Amar as a guest and he pretty much annihilated that theory as being viable at least as to guns.

But I thought it was interesting in the abstract as a way to loosen federal control and lower the stakes in federal elections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#19,677
#19,677
Sudden Impact said:
The reason I didn't want to get into this conversation is because of people like you on the board.
It accomplishes nothing, wastes board space, a game of I gotcha you and the lack of desire to divulge personal information. You have spent more than enough time trying to achieve nothing. It is your opinion, you are hard headed refuse to accept any response and it is a self promoting act to do so. So quit wasting my time. You can always meet me at the Waffle House, but I prefer a roadside bar (Shack) for a meeting someone new.
Click to expand...
The forum is just a gathering place for MAGA-gots, racists, bigots, fascists, haters, liars, and Trumpons, to reinforce each other's rot. Then congratulate one another for ganging up on a target, both overtly and covertly to belittle, bait, and twist topics into, you got it right, Gotchas. Now, and then they pretend to be "trying" to have a decent discourse, but that is just an Admiral Ackbar ploy. They're fun to play with, and I have enjoyed doing so. They're hilarious. Just the same, I got to thank you for making me realize something I already knew, but was having too much fun to act on what I know.

In the words of Gordon R. Dickson's Rumi character,"Water be with you, peace be with you, strength be with you. --The Alien Way
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#19,678
#19,678
RockyTop85 said:
Not to derail the thread, but I heard a podcast host posit this interesting thought that was derived from Justice Breyer’s new book: maybe we just shouldn’t incorporate unenumerated rights to the states (my paraphrased version). Then let them hash those things out democratically. The catch was that the right to bear arms outside the home for self defense would be considered an unenumerated right.

The next episode of the podcast had Akil Amar as a guest and he pretty much annihilated that theory as being viable at least as to guns.

But I thought it was interesting in the abstract as a way to loosen federal control and lower the stakes in federal elections.
Click to expand...

Lowering the stakes of federal elections is an interesting concept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#19,679
#19,679
RockyTop85 said:
Not to derail the thread, but I heard a podcast host posit this interesting thought that was derived from Justice Breyer’s new book: maybe we just shouldn’t incorporate unenumerated rights to the states (my paraphrased version). Then let them hash those things out democratically. The catch was that the right to bear arms outside the home for self defense would be considered an unenumerated right.

The next episode of the podcast had Akil Amar as a guest and he pretty much annihilated that theory as being viable at least as to guns.

But I thought it was interesting in the abstract as a way to loosen federal control and lower the stakes in federal elections.
Click to expand...
I favor much less federal control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#19,686
#19,686
midnight orange said:
The AOSs and MTGs don’t govern. They just mouth off and get clicks. The middle has brought us bankruptcy, war and 35 trillion in debt. The things that get “accomplished” are usually bipartisan and destructive.
Click to expand...
Interesting. So your solution then is to go hard left?
 
#19,687
#19,687
Sudden Impact said:
I wrote Biden off when he was elected, no need to beat a dead horse to death. We knew what we were getting and the Kamala Harris thing was what it was a gimmick. Sorry you did not see that in my post. I felt he was unfit from day one. Jan 6 and the Classified Documents validated my views regarding Trump.

So here we sit with two worthless Candidates that are not qualified to run a Children's Daycare Center..
Click to expand...
That doesn't make you a centrist..that makes you a Dem that sees that Biden is just as trash personally as Trump..maybe worse..idk not for me to say...bottom line is you believe yourself a centrist being right of the extreme left..but your still close enough to be considered a leftist with your one sided rhetoric...
 
#19,688
#19,688
RockyTop85 said:
Not to derail the thread, but I heard a podcast host posit this interesting thought that was derived from Justice Breyer’s new book: maybe we just shouldn’t incorporate unenumerated rights to the states (my paraphrased version). Then let them hash those things out democratically. The catch was that the right to bear arms outside the home for self defense would be considered an unenumerated right.

The next episode of the podcast had Akil Amar as a guest and he pretty much annihilated that theory as being viable at least as to guns.

But I thought it was interesting in the abstract as a way to loosen federal control and lower the stakes in federal elections.
Click to expand...
But wouldn’t that unincorporate the others as well?

Oregon would decide if you could freely assemble within its borders.
Mississippi would decide if you could freely practice religion within its borders.

Or am I missing something here?
 
#19,692
#19,692
whodeycin85 said:
That doesn't make you a centrist..that makes you a Dem that sees that Biden is just as trash personally as Trump..maybe worse..idk not for me to say...bottom line is you believe yourself a centrist being right of the extreme left..but your still close enough to be considered a leftist with your one sided rhetoric...
Click to expand...
you have no clue ³
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#19,693
#19,693
turbovol said:
MAGA now leaning on the comments of a longtime murderous dictator and war criminal. Well done! MAGA again scraping the bottom of the barrel, to put it mildly.
Click to expand...
No, dictators know corruption when they see it and corruption can be seen in what the leftist Dems are doing to Trump.
 
#19,695
#19,695
jmacvols1 said:
No for it's obvious to everyone, even dictators. that the Dems are corrupt in the lawfare they're waging against Trump and his allies.
Click to expand...
Come on man..it is pure coincidence all these cases transpired at the same time for illegalities going as far back a decade, as well as changing SoL. Pure coincidences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, jmacvols1, MemphisVol77 and 1 other person
#19,699
#19,699
whodeycin85 said:
That doesn't make you a centrist..that makes you a Dem that sees that Biden is just as trash personally as Trump..maybe worse..idk not for me to say...bottom line is you believe yourself a centrist being right of the extreme left..but your still close enough to be considered a leftist with your one sided rhetoric...
Click to expand...
grow up --- try reading a book educatning yourself...you ask to many questions to have knowledge typicial board fodder
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top