The murder of Ahmaud Arbery

The one question that you have avoided answering is why did the son get out of the truck with his weapon drawn? What was his purpose and what had he personally witnessed immediately preceding this shooting? I know you don't care who I am and the feeling is mutual. You just seemed to have taken some sort of imagined leadership role in this thread and I'm trying to figure out where all of your fact and proven opinion BS is coming from. I've seen two things, him walking into a vacant home under construction just like many more individuals did and then getting shot because he made a run at a guy holding a gun on him? You have no clue what the guy said to him or did with the gun in the front of the truck. The guy that got out of the truck AND his moron dad were in the wrong in the shooting. Period. End of subject. The guy was wearing floppy shorts and a tshirt. I would say clearly unarmed. The dad was in the back of the truck with pistol drawn. The son should never have gotten out of the truck armed in the first place. If he had gotten out unarmed and said something and then was approached and a weapon appeared, dad would have had a good shot at him from the truck bed. You are standing on one side of the fence claiming your neutrality. It looks stupid.
You can't even get simple facts as they are known to be correct (i.e. dad was back in truck with pistol drawn, which didnt happen until Arbery ran to attack his son),

I am not standing on any side of any fence. I look at all the facts of the case from a legal and relevant standpoint, and I've said it comes down to if the jury believes the two idiots had justification to attempt detainment or they committed agg assault. Do i think they went after Arbery with the intent to kill him? I see no evidence of that.

I think the McMichaels did some dumbass sh** that ended up biting them in the butt because they didn't think it would go so south and that Arbery would actually fight them;
I think Arbery was doing some criminal sh** and ended up deciding to fight them instead of the worry of being arrested/detained, as we see in EVERY other video he had with police

This is what happens when dumbassery goes around. I do know like with Trayvon and Brown and every other case like this, it's much more layered and deep than just "DiD uZ seee thoze WHiTE gUyZ mURDER tHaTT blACK DudEE in Colld bloOD bc He Wuz JoGGIN?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
The one question that you have avoided answering is why did the son get out of the truck with his weapon drawn? What was his purpose and what had he personally witnessed immediately preceding this shooting? I know you don't care who I am and the feeling is mutual. You just seemed to have taken some sort of imagined leadership role in this thread and I'm trying to figure out where all of your fact and proven opinion BS is coming from. I've seen two things, him walking into a vacant home under construction just like many more individuals did and then getting shot because he made a run at a guy holding a gun on him? You have no clue what the guy said to him or did with the gun in the front of the truck. The guy that got out of the truck AND his moron dad were in the wrong in the shooting. Period. End of subject. The guy was wearing floppy shorts and a tshirt. I would say clearly unarmed. The dad was in the back of the truck with pistol drawn. The son should never have gotten out of the truck armed in the first place. If he had gotten out unarmed and said something and then was approached and a weapon appeared, dad would have had a good shot at him from the truck bed. You are standing on one side of the fence claiming your neutrality. It looks stupid.

Very dumb for McMichael to get out of the truck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
You can't even get simple facts as they are known to be correct (i.e. dad was back in truck with pistol drawn, which didnt happen until Arbery ran to attack his son),

I am not standing on any side of any fence. I look at all the facts of the case from a legal and relevant standpoint, and I've said it comes down to if the jury believes the two idiots had justification to attempt detainment or they committed agg assault. Do i think they went after Arbery with the intent to kill him? I see no evidence of that.

I think the McMichaels did some dumbass sh** that ended up biting them in the butt because they didn't think it would go so south and that Arbery would actually fight them;
I think Arbery was doing some criminal sh** and ended up deciding to fight them instead of the worry of being arrested/detained, as we see in EVERY other video he had with police

This is what happens when dumbassery goes around. I do know like with Trayvon and Brown and every other case like this, it's much more layered and deep than just "DiD uZ seee thoze WHiTE gUyZ mURDER tHaTT blACK DudEE in Colld bloOD bc He Wuz JoGGIN?"
What's so ****ing stupid about your dumbassery is that we are basically saying the same thing. I don't care what EVERY OTHER VIDEO shows about the guy. You CANNOT do what the two Billy Bob's did. How do you know when the old man got in the back of the truck? It's not in the video so that guess is hearsay. What you can't get through your thick skull is it doesn't matter what he did leading up to him being detained because neither one of the Billy Bobs saw him do it. He hadn't committed a violent crime, he wasn't armed, he tried to avoid the guy getting out of the truck with a gun. What happened after that, I DON'T KNOW AND NEITHER DO YOU. Why can't you see that is all there is too this. What he did leading up to those guys drawing down on him has NO impact here because they did not witness it. That **** in bold just makes you look even more stupid than you already do.
 
What's so ****ing stupid about your dumbassery is that we are basically saying the same thing. I don't care what EVERY OTHER VIDEO shows about the guy. You CANNOT do what the two Billy Bob's did. How do you know when the old man got in the back of the truck? It's not in the video so that guess is hearsay. What you can't get through your thick skull is it doesn't matter what he did leading up to him being detained because neither one of the Billy Bobs saw him do it. He hadn't committed a violent crime, he wasn't armed, he tried to avoid the guy getting out of the truck with a gun. What happened after that, I DON'T KNOW AND NEITHER DO YOU. Why can't you see that is all there is too this. What he did leading up to those guys drawing down on him has NO impact here because they did not witness it. That **** in bold just makes you look even more stupid than you already do.
I think you need to check your blood pressure man, you are going to stroke out.
 
No i never went inside someone's home or property without permission. I respect privacy/property rights

When my wife and I were looking at houses, we found a subdivision we liked and walked through several of the framed-up houses to see if we liked any of the floorplans. I guess we're bad people. I'll have to live with the shame.
 
You can't even get simple facts as they are known to be correct (i.e. dad was back in truck with pistol drawn, which didnt happen until Arbery ran to attack his son),

I am not standing on any side of any fence. I look at all the facts of the case from a legal and relevant standpoint, and I've said it comes down to if the jury believes the two idiots had justification to attempt detainment or they committed agg assault. Do i think they went after Arbery with the intent to kill him? I see no evidence of that.

I think the McMichaels did some dumbass sh** that ended up biting them in the butt because they didn't think it would go so south and that Arbery would actually fight them;
I think Arbery was doing some criminal sh** and ended up deciding to fight them instead of the worry of being arrested/detained, as we see in EVERY other video he had with police

This is what happens when dumbassery goes around. I do know like with Trayvon and Brown and every other case like this, it's much more layered and deep than just "DiD uZ seee thoze WHiTE gUyZ mURDER tHaTT blACK DudEE in Colld bloOD bc He Wuz JoGGIN?"

Was Arbery "fighting them" or was he availing himself of whatever Stand Your Ground law Georgia has surely enacted?
 
You can't even get simple facts as they are known to be correct (i.e. dad was back in truck with pistol drawn, which didnt happen until Arbery ran to attack his son),

I am not standing on any side of any fence. I look at all the facts of the case from a legal and relevant standpoint, and I've said it comes down to if the jury believes the two idiots had justification to attempt detainment or they committed agg assault. Do i think they went after Arbery with the intent to kill him? I see no evidence of that.

I think the McMichaels did some dumbass sh** that ended up biting them in the butt because they didn't think it would go so south and that Arbery would actually fight them;
I think Arbery was doing some criminal sh** and ended up deciding to fight them instead of the worry of being arrested/detained, as we see in EVERY other video he had with police

This is what happens when dumbassery goes around. I do know like with Trayvon and Brown and every other case like this, it's much more layered and deep than just "DiD uZ seee thoze WHiTE gUyZ mURDER tHaTT blACK DudEE in Colld bloOD bc He Wuz JoGGIN?"

Was Arbery "fighting them" or was he availing himself of whatever Stand Your Ground law Georgia has surely enacted?
 
That’s the crutch of what the grand jury will decide

The argument that he was being chased by men with guns and had a right to defend himself however he saw fit seems pretty compelling here. Even if charging a guy with a gun is a bad idea, I could see him being desperate when it looks like he's being pinned in.
 
The argument that he was being chased by men with guns and had a right to defend himself however he saw fit seems pretty compelling here. Even if charging a guy with a gun is a bad idea, I could see him being desperate when it looks like he's being pinned in.
Most agree.

But there are those that blame Arbery for attacking that poor guy with the shotgun and getting shot with it 3 times. Might only have been once if he had just stood there.
 
Most agree.

But there are those that blame Arbery for attacking that poor guy with the shotgun and getting shot with it 3 times. Might only have been once if he had just stood there.
Or likely wouldn’t have been shot at all since they were waiting on the police
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol
Or likely wouldn’t have been shot at all since they were waiting on the police

So if a guy in a truck chases you down then gets out and comes at you with a gun, you are going to calmly and rationally think, "Gee golly and shucks, maybe I should stop and subject myself to the will of this random guy with a gun while I wait for the cops to show up?"
 
@GAVol I read where the defense attorneys are a husband-wife team of Mercer Law grads who live in Macon. Do you know much about the lawyers involved?
Yep. . . That'd be Frank and Laura Hogue. Frank Hogue has become a pretty renowned defense attorney. If you remember the Stephen McDaniel case here a few years ago where a law student was convicted of killing his classmate, Hogue was the attorney on that one too.
 

VN Store



Back
Top