DEFENDTHISHOUSE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 28,428
- Likes
- 31,783
Who's to say the guy ran around the truck hit the one guy ran over to the other guy and tried to take his gun away and got shot in the process? Who's to say he initiated the whole physical confrontation?
That's my whole point, there's not while lot on that video that tells the story.
And you should get horse and enter the Olympics because you're so good at jumping to conclusions. You have exactly no idea what happened here. You're assuming the guy did nothing to initiate the response from the guy with the gun.You should join the women's gymnastics team because you're doing some amazing backflips trying to justify what these guys did. You could win a gold medal.
Oh come on. Can't we have some intellectual honesty here?Who's to say the guy ran around the truck hit the one guy ran over to the other guy and tried to take his gun away and got shot in the process? Who's to say he initiated the whole physical confrontation?
That's my whole point, there's not while lot on that video that tells the story.
Agreed. But what we do know is that Jim Bob and Cletus armed themselves and pursued a guy whom they had not seen commit any crime. Cletus got out of the car, shotgun in hand,
This gap is what we have no idea as to what happened.
and the guy wound up dead. The only way Cletus could have defended himself from the person who created the imminent danger would have been to blow his own head off.
And you should get horse and enter the Olympics because you're so good at jumping to conclusions. You have exactly no idea what happened here. You're assuming the guy did nothing to initiate the response from the guy with the gun.
Oh come on. Can't we have some intellectual honesty here?
I understand your and Ricky's position. And had there been some different circumstances, I could easily be in complete agreement with both of you.
Based on the video posted and the news article, this situation escalated unnecessarily. Gun owners have a higher responsibility. The fact that one had LEO experience is even worse.
Who's to say the guy ran around the truck hit the one guy ran over to the other guy and tried to take his gun away and got shot in the process? Who's to say he initiated the whole physical confrontation?
That's my whole point, there's not while lot on that video that tells the story.
He made a ridiculous assumption that the guy would have shot him in the back so I responded in kind. You guys have convicted based on two things, neither of which are illegal, having guns, and confronting a guy. I'm not defending anyone here, but no one here has enough evidence to convict anyone. We don't know what happened.Oh come on. Can't we have some intellectual honesty here?
I understand your and Ricky's position. And had there been some different circumstances, I could easily be in complete agreement with both of you.
Based on the video posted and the news article, this situation escalated unnecessarily. Gun owners have a higher responsibility. The fact that one had LEO experience is even worse.
This gap is what we have no idea as to what happened.
Did you run up and punch a guy several times and try to steal his shotgun?JFC, so if 2 guys chase me down the street in a truck with guns, cut me off twice, and then get out and come at me with a gun and I end up shot.....this is my fault?
You have quite the nerve telling others they are jumping to conclusions when your back has to be hurting in the way you're stretching.
Just because he confronted the guy doesn't mean he intended to shoot him. The guy very well may have come at him. You nor I know.