The murder of Ahmaud Arbery

My apologies if I misscharacterized your position but I thought you used the words " I convict them of". Maybe I missed it. Like I said I'm not defending the two guys, I just don't see enough to convict them of murder. Definitely terrible judgment.

ROFL, you sure about that?
 
A) 911 told him not to pursue. They didn't need his damn help.

B) Bull f***ing sh** on you saying the narrative is BS. The police report itself says they saw him looking in the window of a house under construction and lead redneck THOUGHT he looked like a guy that he had HEARD was trying to break into other houses. In other words, assumed.

C) If he "knows what he's doing" I hate to see it when he has no idea. And he's NOT a cop anymore, so him USED to being a cop means jack sh**.
Still wanna know where you're getting 911 info.
 
Well good idea, because he had already done that. They had cut him off once and he ran the other way and they had caught up to him again.

Also, they could have never chased after him too.
I never said they did the right thing. My only point has been you nor I nor anyone on this board knows what happened between when he went around the truck and when the fight begins. You have to assume. You don't convict people with assumptions. Hopefully if they are guilty, more evidence will surface and they'll get what's coming to them .
 
Ok and I stated that I wouldn’t have done the same thing as these two. One was a retired police officer and knows what he’s doing. He didn’t just profile this guy jogging. That narrative is completely BS when you look at all the facts presented

You can disagree with how they handled it but they called 911 and tried to keep up to identify the guy. The situation changed for the worse when the suspect attacked the dude and tried to grab his shotgun. Then it becomes a true life or death scenario no matter what happened.
Him being a retired PO makes it worse. If their only intention was to identify and help the police, why not follow at a distance? They tried to play cowboys and someone died. They should be held accountable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
My apologies if I misscharacterized your position but I thought you used the words " I convict them of". Maybe I missed it. Like I said I'm not defending the two guys, I just don't see enough to convict them of murder. Definitely terrible judgment.
I used "convicting" with "my opinion" in parenthesis. That's as far as my 'conviction' of them go atm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I never said they did the right thing. My only point has been you nor I nor anyone on this board knows what happened between when he went around the truck and when the fight begins. You have to assume. You don't convict people with assumptions. Hopefully if they are guilty, more evidence will surface and they'll get what's coming to them .

You most certainly can convict given all the evidence shown and the official police account. Maybe not murder but you sure as hell can reasonably go after manslaughter charges. I don't have to see what happened in front of the truck.
 
ROFL, you sure about that?
Yea I'm sure about that. I've stated it multiple times. I just don't convict people because I don't like them. Notice how you and other have refered to them as bubba's and rednecks while I've refered to the dead guy as the jogger and not the robber? Even though there is reasonable evidence to say he actually could be responsible for the robberies. It's because I don't know. You have 1% of the evidence here and have already sentenced them to death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Even good people make bad judgements.

Look at you and your new avi for example.
You love it and you know it. If it had the animation wave it would be ten times cooler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Did their steering wheel not work? They chased him down once, what makes you believe they wouldn’t do it again?
Maybe they would have. Maybe it would have bought him enough time for the cops to arrive? I know I wouldn't run at someone with a gun that I felt was a threat.
 
Ok and I stated that I wouldn’t have done the same thing as these two. One was a retired police officer and knows what he’s doing. He didn’t just profile this guy jogging. That narrative is completely BS when you look at all the facts presented

You can disagree with how they handled it but they called 911 and tried to keep up to identify the guy. The situation changed for the worse when the suspect attacked the dude and tried to grab his shotgun. Then it becomes a true life or death scenario no matter what happened.

Also they didn't catch him in the act of anything. The shooter claims he saw the guy "the other night" and he saw him jogging and said to his son "That's him", then went after him.

You're the one pushing a BS narrative that they caught him in the act because even the shooter doesn't claim that. But good to know you think it's cool if I see you and think you look like a dude that might have done something that I can chase you with guns and it's all good.
 
You most certainly can convict given all the evidence shown and the official police account. Maybe not murder but you sure as hell can reasonably go after manslaughter charges. I don't have to see what happened in front of the truck.
No you don't that's why you're wrong. That's the crucial part of the interaction.
 

VN Store



Back
Top