Behr
GoVols!
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 126,588
- Likes
- 172,065
He may have been a sweet young man, but I haven't bought the "avid jogger" story since seeing the initial video.
I don't have any idea if he was looking to steal. He was looking around an unfinished house for less than five minutes and didn't steal a thing. I see no reason that one should try to impugn his motives unless one is seeking to justify the McMichaels' actions.
Further, he was never confronted before taking off from the site. So no, we cannot all agree with your clearly false description of events.
He 100% wasn’t just a jogger who was racially profiled by mean white guys like we were first told.
He may not have stolen anything because there was nothing to steal. He may have been looking for tools, etc. and found nothing. I am unwilling to believe the jogger narrative at this point. And, I'm not justifying killing anyone. I think the killing was an unfortunate turn of events for everyone involved.He may have been a sweet young man, but I haven't bought the "avid jogger" story since seeing the initial video.
I don't have any idea if he was looking to steal. He was looking around an unfinished house for less than five minutes and didn't steal a thing. I see no reason that one should try to impugn his motives unless one is seeking to justify the McMichaels' actions.
Further, he was never confronted before taking off from the site. So no, we cannot all agree with your clearly false description of events.
Sorry, didn't mean for it to cone across as an accusation. I hit reply before I finished my comment so I was rushing to fix it.
Does his history matter? If he had 1 shoplifting conviction or 5?
Correct. He was a young black man that was in the neighborhood and looked like someone who might have been spotted on a security camera a number of days prior to the incident. The construction site has no bearing on the McMichaels' decisions because they did not know that he'd been there.
If the family and media are trying to make him into another "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown or sweet 12 year old Trayvon Martin, it does to me because I don't like liars. As far as killing the guy, it makes no difference.Sorry, didn't mean for it to come across as an accusation. I hit reply before I finished my comment so I was rushing to fix it.
Does his history matter? If he had 1 shoplifting conviction or 5?
Hell no I don't believe he was just some random innocent guy. He clearly had a past and may have been up to no good. The thing is, unless he was directly threatening the McMichaels, I don't see how his past matters. You can't just threaten somebody with a gun who isn't posing an imminent threat to your life.You really believe the “he was just a jogger” narrative? Have you seen the videos of him in the house? Or the fact that he was 10 miles from home
You’re assuming there were things worth stealing and he just didn’t take them.
Surveillance idk if it was video or images? But it has shown him there on multiple occasions at night. I can’t find a plausible explanation other than theft to be in an empty home at night (unless you’re squaring, but obviously he didn’t sleep there).
Why do you believe he took off running out of the front door? Seems to me he did so because of the guy across the street on his phone calling 911.
If the family and media are trying to make him into another "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown or sweet 12 year old Trayvon Martin, it does to me because I don't like liars. As far as killing the guy, it makes no difference.
I don't know what kind of person he is.You really believe the “he was just a jogger” narrative? Have you seen the videos of him in the house? Or the fact that he was 10 miles from home
So if he had 5 convictions of shoplifting in the past and we have a video of him inside the unfinished house but leaving with nothing, its okay for these two guys that know nothing about any of that, to chase him down and kill him?Given a history of theft and him being seen in this home multiple times at night, yes it does matter. It points to the idea that his motivation was theft.
I can still see a legit case for manslaughter. But the more I look at the details, idk if I could find them guilty. He 100% wasn’t just a jogger who was racially profiled by mean white guys like we were first told.
Between you and me, you're the only one making assumptions. I'm not assuming a thing. He may have had bad motives. I don't know because there is no way anyone could possibly know. What I do know is that he didn't actually steal anything.
The only video from the site that any of us have seen is from a few minutes before the shooting. If Arbery had been on the site before that day, the homeowner has not come out and said as much. And he's made public statements thru his attorney.
[QUOTE}
Why do you believe he took off running out of the front door? Seems to me he did so because of the guy across the street on his phone calling 911.
He was the person spotted on security cameras. He didn’t just look like him. They did not know he’d been where? Inside the home? If not, why do you believe they went after him?
So if he had 5 convictions of shoplifting in the past and we have a video of him inside the unfinished house but leaving with nothing, its okay for these two guys that know nothing about any of that, to chase him down and kill him?
You seem to believe that the unfinished house belonged to the McMichaels and/or that they had access to the security cameras. Neither is true, and they've never claimed that they knew a thing about him being in that house.
Given a history of theft and him being seen in this home multiple times at night, yes it does matter. It points to the idea that his motivation was theft.
Their guilty of manslaughter at the very least all day/every day. Felony murder at the most.
See, I don't care if he was jogging or casing the place out to rob. Neither one of those matter from where I sit. If he had been arrested and we were talking about his punishment then it might matter. But its already been decided. They thought he might have been planning to steal something, so they killed him.If the family and media are trying to make him into another "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown or sweet 12 year old Trayvon Martin, it does to me because I don't like liars. As far as killing the guy, it makes no difference.
That may be the case. I don't think it will hold much relevance in the grand scheme of things because as @bamawriter had said, the McMichaels apparently were unaware of the construction site incident.
I don't think anybody has said that anybody deserved to die for 5 shoplifting convictions or being in a house.So if he had 5 convictions of shoplifting in the past and we have a video of him inside the unfinished house but leaving with nothing, its okay for these two guys that know nothing about any of that, to chase him down and kill him?