Behr
GoVols!
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 126,588
- Likes
- 172,063
According to Ricky (so take this with a grain of salt),that neighborhood only had one entrance in/out. So maybe he got as far as he knew he could at that critical moment (maybe he was looking further ahead as he was running on the passenger side of the truck)and decided to take a stand right there in the street.honestly, I go back and forth on that. There intent wasn’t to kill him and he does seem to initiate the physical altercation.
You can pretend these details don’t matter, but when ultimately they do. If he had been an innocent jogger, we would all be for conviction. I do support there being a trial so more info can come to light. Right now, idk if I’d be willing to convict them if I were on that jury.
I think his death is due partly to his actions and partly to the chasers. Without both, we wouldn't be discussing it.See, I don't care if he was jogging or casing the place out to rob. Neither one of those matter from where I sit. If he had been arrested and we were talking about his punishment then it might matter. But its already been decided. They thought he might have been planning to steal something, so they killed him.
He won't look like he's gonna attempt to steal anything again. Fosho.
None of that stuff happened. Why lie?As more info comes out is there a single person who actually believes the families narrative that he was just a sweet young man who likes to jog?
Or can we all agree he was clearly looking for something to steal and took off running when confronted?
Once again, everyone’s first clue something was off should’ve been the high school senior pic the media was using for a man who’s closer to 30 than 20
The home belonged to the man with them who was filming. Out of curiosity why did you believe they were chasing if they were unaware?
I think his death is due partly to his actions and partly to the chasers. Without both, we wouldn't be discussing it.
So, you think that he would have been shot had he not tried to grab the gun?None of that stuff happened. Why lie?
Another lie. The homeowners said they had no part in this and don't know the murderers or the guy who filmed who many want charged too. They also did not think it was him on the camera.
I bet. Good people on both sides huh. lmao
We have no way of knowing but it is a reasonable assumption with the hit squad chasing him down like this is 1934.So, you think that he would have been shot had he not tried to grab the gun?
None of that stuff happened. Why lie?
Another lie. The homeowners said they had no part in this and don't know the murderers or the guy who filmed who many want charged too. They also did not think it was him on the camera.
I bet. Good people on both sides huh. lmao
I'm sorry, I was referencing this post.....just has a "they were out to kill the black dude" feel to it:If you are referring to me, I have never entertained the hunting black folks scenario. You need to think more clearly.
Bull$hit. That's the worse excuse I've heard from you. You cannot say that with any kind of certainty. Why did those two mouth breathers bring guns to the confrontation in the first place? If there weren't any guns at the scene of that confrontation, then Arbery would still be alive.
This post is exactly is why people are discrediting you in this thread. You desperately want to defend the perps and throw shade on the victim.