None of that is new to me. Its funny the link said he was a jogger and they already had an armed confrontation with him. They don't know if he was just pulling up his pants or messing with his junk. But by gawd they thought he might have one when they took off after him the day they killed him.
He investigated Arbery previously, I thought. I looked and found this:
Didn't take that context from it. Who says that it was the violation of probation or the original case for the gun possession at high school that McMichael was involved with? I didn't get that distiction from the article. Maybe you have another and better report? I'm pretty sure he didn't connect him with his previous incident/contact. A high school age teen and a 25 year old man's appearance can and usually changes drastically. If it was the probation violation, who knows what he did in regards to that case? It merely shows that he had a previous investigation involving Arbery and that's it. You can draw anything you feel like from it but it's just information.
I knew a guy who was shot deader than a hammer by the police because he used a pair of vise grips to open the passenger door to get out. The door handle was missing from the door panel inside the car. It was after dark and the policeman saw the dead man holding a shiny object in his hand, that reflected the flashing lights on the cop car. He was armed with a pair of vice grips. The victim was a poor white man, so there was basically no news coverage.
Not that interesting. The way I read it, he did not actually witness the "confrontation" between McMichael and Arbery so we only have McMichael's word that it went down that way. Arbery is dead so he can't dispute it. Also, what is this about describing a vehicle Arbery entered? Arbery was on foot. If he saw a black man get into a vehicle, was it a different black man than Arbery? Makes no sense.
