You’re assuming though that the teams you’re lobbying for would do better or at minimum as good. That’s the question the committee is posed with; is a 13-17 LSU team better than an 18-12 Troy team. I’d pose it to you this way, if you had the money to wager and were a gambling man who would you bet on to go further in the NCAAT; Troy/CofC/GaSo or LSU/Vandy/Scar/UF? The 3 teams you’ve lobbied for played a combined 36 Q1 games, UF played 31 by themselves. Ga So won 22% of their Q1 games if that held and they did that over UF’s schedule they’d be 7-24 in Q1 games compared to UF’s 13-18. If they had gone 5-6 in their Q1 games and had a comparable winning % as UF or LSU they’d have a case. But when the at large field is, in essence, all Q1 teams we see how they would be expected to perform based on their data from the very recent past. JMU who had a worse or equal conference record as Troy and Ga So, also got in out of the Sun Belt, why? Because they played 15 Q1 games and went 7-8 and their SOS was 47 places higher.