ooltewahvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,352
- Likes
- 0
Not much in life is a guarantee, but the blood ties they had to UT made them easier sells. Harder to sell to a recruit that has no ties.
What does it mean that we've accepted the commits of so many lesser rated prospects? Have we struck out with Shy Tuttle? Drew Richmond? Any number of prospects that many on here have been drooling over? When players I haven't heard of start committing to UT(and UT accepts), I get a little alarmed. We're now at 22 commits and not all of our needs are addressed. There's still a long way to go til NSD, but have we painted ourselves into a corner? I'm not a fan of taking a young man's commit with the idea of possibly chasing him off if bigger fish come along. Why tell some of these lesser rated prospects they have a spot when those big fish are still out there? Do the coaches know we aren't going to get these bigger fish? It's worrisome IMO.
And before I set off an uproar with those that will ultimately bash me as being negative, read the thread title. You don't have to respond to every thread on VN and there is an ignore function. I'm just curious if there are others who share my concern.
Not much in life is a guarantee, but the blood ties they had to UT made them easier sells. Harder to sell to a recruit that has no ties.
If he wins more, then he'll have earned my trust. Earn my trust, and my opinion changes. All any of us are expressing on here are opinions. If you don't like my opinion, you don't need to respond to my post.
See what a simple process that is.
I'd much rather get to NSD and have about 14 openings so we could get a bunch of those "diamonds-in-the-rough". We could probably "steal" some top notch players from Georgia State, UTEP, Miami (OH) and UAB if we waited.
jk
I really like being finished up before September.