The Problems with Trans-ideology

#5,853
#5,853
creekdipper said:
The "observed throughout the natural world" has nothing to do with being weird or creepy. Name one thing that you find weird or creepy, and I guarantee that it's "found in the natural world."

(Unless you just sit around imagining bizarre scenarios with no known recorded instances or some futuristic/horror/mutant fiction, which is not the topic).

Yes, "weird' and "creepy" are subjective terms which can be applied to anything. So?
Click to expand...

If you want to take the subjective route, then referring to a lifestyle pursued by 1 in every 10 people as creepy or weird makes you a bigoted dickturd and I'd bet my bottom dollar you'd never say it to anyone's face.

That better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and NashVol11
#5,856
#5,856
utvolpj said:
So you literally posted these words below but claim they don't actually mean you would beat someone up or approve of it being done? That's your hill?

What do these words truly mean then?
Click to expand...

Yeah i was editing my post in the 2 whole minutes it took you to reply there officer. Nothing gets past you and your crossdressing buddy there who also already liked your post in that couple minute span
 
#5,858
#5,858
Vol8188 said:
I’d be curious to know if you have any specific ideas as to what that purpose would be?

Population control?
Promotion of greater male unity within a species as opposed to the typical male fighting?
Something else?
Click to expand...
There has also been research suggesting it is a byproduct of genetic makeup creating strong sexual drive and fertility among female members of a family. The research was from a few years ago so not sure what the thinking is now.

I'm also leaning toward separate reasons for homosexual men and women. I believe there are different drivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188 and marcusluvsvols
#5,859
#5,859
DinkinFlicka said:
If you want to take the subjective route, then referring to a lifestyle pursued by 1 in every 10 people as creepy or weird makes you a bigoted dickturd and I'd bet my bottom dollar you'd never say it to anyone's face.

That better?
Click to expand...

One in ten? Still relying upon Kinsey's debunked "research?"

Well, chalk up another dollar you've lost. Not everyone is as sensitive and insecure as you seem to think, nor are they so quick to resort to name-calling. Millions of people have common political, social, sexual, and religious views that others find to be weird or creepy. And they can be told that to their (and our) face, and they (we) don't blow a gasket. We share views, disagree, argue passionately, listen, and part on good terms until the next discussion.

Isn't that what tolerance, diversity, and inclusion is all about?

(Also, your use of the term "lifestyle" would likely get some nasty comments and suggestions from some folks to whom you refer, but I doubt you'd be any more bothered than I am by the easily-offended bomb-throwers).
 
Last edited:
#5,860
#5,860
marcusluvsvols said:
You are truly the dumbest mofo on this entire board. Its astonishing. A complete basketcase too scared to come out of the closet. Hahaha
Click to expand...
Nah, the dumbest one would be the guy inventing entire life stories about other people because he's too much of a baby to admit he's wrong (again)
 
Last edited:
#5,862
#5,862
marcusluvsvols said:
Yeah i was editing my post in the 2 whole minutes it took you to reply there officer. Nothing gets past you and your crossdressing buddy there who also already liked your post in that couple minute span
Click to expand...
Gets past me? I called the exact same post out last month and you called me a liar then as well. You want kids to be assaulted by their peers because of a race. I get that you love to flex but maybe stop and reflect on what you're saying
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#5,863
#5,863
NashVol11 said:
Nah, the dumbest one would be the guy inventing entire life stories about other people because he's too much of a stupid b!tch to admit he's wrong (again)
Click to expand...

Lmao. You would never, ever call me any of that in person sport. We both know that much.

No straight man knows literally everything about tranny nonsense and spends hours a day arguing with countless strangers about it online. You swear on a stack that you're not a woman but argue incessantly like one with half a dozen different posters just in this thread alone.

I couldnt care less that you are mentally ill and pretend to be a woman. You do you. I cant stand you because you're an idiot that will hide behind the anonymity of the internet calling another grown man a b!tch that you would never, ever have the balls to say to an actual man like me face to face. Must suck to be a coward like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#5,865
#5,865
utvolpj said:
Gets past me? I called the exact same post out last month and you called me a liar then as well. You want kids to be assaulted by their peers because of a race. I get that you love to flex but maybe stop and reflect on what you're saying
Click to expand...

You done officer? Go bother someone else.
 
#5,867
#5,867
marcusluvsvols said:
Lmao. You would never, ever call me any of that in person sport. We both know that much.

No straight man knows literally everything about tranny nonsense and spends hours a day arguing with countless strangers about it online. You swear on a stack that you're not a woman but argue incessantly like one with half a dozen different posters just in this thread alone.

I couldnt care less that you are mentally ill and pretend to be a woman. You do you. I cant stand you because you're an idiot that will hide behind the anonymity of the internet calling another grown man a b!tch that you would never, ever have the balls to say to an actual man like me face to face. Must suck to be a coward like that.
Click to expand...
"Coward" would be the one that talks ABOUT me every day and not TO me, and "coward" would also be the one who runs away from his own opinions or deflects them with "officer."

This is getting boring, you write all these paragraphs and it always turns out that you weren't smart enough to think of the obvious responses to them
 
#5,873
#5,873
DinkinFlicka said:
"Change what it means to be a woman" doesn't even remotely fall under the same category for you? Really?

.... really?
Click to expand...

Not even remotely. She never claimed your push to redefine woman would make her less of a woman. And she’s not wrong that there’s an obvious push to redefine womanhood
 
#5,874
#5,874
creekdipper said:
The poster said "prevalent," which means "widespread" (as in common). That is untrue. Moving the goalposts to "has been observed" is being disingenuous. All sorts of human and animal behavior has "been observed" (pretty much anything that is possible to occur).

That does not make the behavior "prevalent." The fact is that even researchers who have observed the behavior have concluded that homosexual predispositions are a rarity. It's like Kinsey's flawed "research" that concluded that ten percent of the population is homosexual...a fallacy that was accepted and repeated for years. The problem was that Kinsey was relying upon information obtained from prisoners without heterosexual options.

Researchers have also suggested that some homosexual behavior observed in animal social groups was likely a social method used to assert dominance (or, conversely, to instill bonding). As far as individual homosexual encounters go, anyone who has been around dogs very long has probably witnessed them humping human legs or even inanimate objects. Doesn't mean that dogs have some deep sexual attraction to human legs.

As for being "natural," that's a semantical canard. Any incident that has ever been observed even once is technically "natural" since it happened in nature.
Click to expand...
Homosexual behaviors are prevalent in the natural world, as in they are observed across many species and in many settings.

They are not the dominant behavior in any one species, as they are not the dominant behavior in our species.

Yes, a mass-extinction asteroid strike is a natural event. They have happened. In nature.

Far cry from homosexual behaviors in natures. Which are observed regularly. Which have been going on regularly - for millions of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top