Some of you apparently do not understand my feelings towards Tiger. Here they are, in a nutshell:
1) He is by far the best golfer of the last 40 years.
2) He was not afraid of his competition.
3) He would excel in any era.
4) You can't compare eras, due to balls, clubs, training, and agronomy. So was he better than Nicklaus, Hogan, Snead, Jones, Hagen, Nelson, Sarazen, etc.? Don't know. He beat everybody that he competed against, but so did they, most of the time.
5) He is not too old to compete. If he starts winning again, will you still say he is too old?
6) His troubles off the course only derailed him for a short time. They are not responsible for his poor play today.
7) He could compete against they guys out there today, if he was in his prime.
8) If Woods and Nicklaus were in the same era, they would have some great battles, just like Nicklaus had with Trevino and Watson. Just like Hogan and Snead......2 greats in the same era.
9) From all that I read about his latest return, his health and golf game at home were in good shape when he entered the Hero World Challenge, The Farmer's and Dubai.
10) I continue to believe that the reasons for his poor play are lack of confidence, swing confusion, and to a lesser extent, injuries. I don't think age is involved to much of an extent.
11) I think it is very possible that he was taking performance enhancing drugs, and has lost that edge without them.
12) I firmly think that if he had kept his thin body type, not lifted weights, and kept his swing that he had coming out of college, and not tried to change instructors to make the perfect golf swing, that he would have won over 20 majors by now. Good grief, he won the Masters by 12 shots with that. At least, I think it was 12.
13) I still don't like him, or feel sorry for him.