The you don't want to get involved in this discussion thread (split)

14 for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, 15 who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts accusing or else excusing them) 16 in the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel.

Does that mean something in English?
 
And some people are cheaters, they are both sinful desires. What's especially funny is people like you who support legalizing Gay marriage, not realizing that marriage in the US is based on the bible. And where does it stop front there, allowing gay marriage is fine, but then shouldn't we also legalize 3, 4, and 5 people being able to get married. Funny how some parts of the bible count but other parts don't. Both are sins as it clearly states in the bible, and you and I sin just as much as any gay person out there, it just isn't a hot topic for the media. Get your stuff together rookie

If a church doesn't want to recognize gay marriage then whatever floats their boat. It's a completely different issue for the government to recognize it though. Panics the government decided to grant so many special rights to married couples, they should have an obligation to acknowledge hetero and homosexual marriage so as to treat all citizens equally. Not doing so because of Christianity is religious persecution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
how do you know they were born that way ? because that is what they say ? when you were born did you know what being gay was at 1 yr old ?

Did you know what being straight was? Actually, you may have, because you were most likely raised to be straight.
 
People weren't meant to be born with Down syndrome or chromes disease but it happens. It is just genetic combinations that show up in people.

So you're saying that being gay has to do with the wrong mix of genetics? So that would mean that almost any choice we make can go back to genetics?
 
And some people are cheaters, they are both sinful desires. What's especially funny is people like you who support legalizing Gay marriage, not realizing that marriage in the US is based on the bible. And where does it stop front there, allowing gay marriage is fine, but then shouldn't we also legalize 3, 4, and 5 people being able to get married. Funny how some parts of the bible count but other parts don't. Both are sins as it clearly states in the bible, and you and I sin just as much as any gay person out there, it just isn't a hot topic for the media. Get your stuff together rookie

I'm pretty sure marriage in the US is based on insurance coverage, taxes and estate planning, not the bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
If a church doesn't want to recognize gay marriage then whatever floats their boat. It's a completely different issue for the government to recognize it though. Panics the government decided to grant so many special rights to married couples, they should have an obligation to acknowledge hetero and homosexual marriage so as to treat all citizens equally. Not doing so because of Christianity is religious persecution.

I'm not saying you are wrong but it's just the way it is. Marriage was based on two people, a man and a woman, it comes straight from the bible. And if we want to throw that out the window, then why shouldn't we allow 3-5 people get married and take advantage of those same rights. What makes you stop at two? Where did the two come from?
 
A way to know that people weren't meant to be gay is that gays can't reproduce which is a basic survival tactic for any species.

Male dogs hump one another but no one cares. Reproduction has nothing to do with this.
 
so you are saying a person that is gay is a sickness and not a choice ?

No, I'm saying both naturally occur and are equally valid. I don't pass judgment on homosexuality being wrong, just different from what I am. Since it causes no one any harm your classification as a "sickness" is way off base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So is drug addicts and alcoholics born that way as well? Nope.

No point in announcing your sexuality other than for attention. Shouldn't act like it's a big deal and it won't be!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Mark Swartz of Espn said a bar erupted in cheers when it was shown on tv. Bull ****. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. lol.

Goes to show the media will be ridiculous with this. It's sad.

Was this said bar located on Canderbilt's fraternity row?
 
Personally my existence seems a little to special to me to be an accident. I guess it's human nature to believe we are here for some bigger purpose. I want to believe that, but I also am a realist and everything points to us being here by dumb luck. Just a little proof would be nice. The whole blind faith thing is a tough one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
So is drug addicts and alcoholics born that way as well? Nope.

No point in announcing your sexuality other than for attention. Shouldn't act like it's a big deal and it won't be!

Yes I'm sure they love all the attention from homophobes and bigots. Sign me up.
 
No, I'm saying both naturally occur and are equally valid. I don't pass judgment on homosexuality being wrong, just different from what I am. Since it causes no one any harm your classification as a "sickness" is way off base.

I done explained my screw up on the sickness part. I don't care who is gay or who isn't. I just don't believe a person is born that way and that is my opinion and that is all Im saying.
 
Or let me use an example. There's a scene in "The Aviator," where Katharine Hepburn's mother is complaining about people who make a big deal out of money. Howard Hughes responds by saying, "You don't care about money, because you've always had it."

Take sexuality and place into this conversation and you have your reason why it is indeed a big deal for gay people.

So are you saying that gays haven't had their sexuality? Because if so, that's stupid. That can't be taken away from anyone unless one goes under the knife. You cannot simply replace money with sexuality because that statement would be incomplete and borderline middle schoolish. Now if you replace money with open sexuality then it kinda makes sense.
 

VN Store



Back
Top