Volfan1000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2020
- Messages
- 12,113
- Likes
- 18,111
Agreed.Yes the name is horrible but I don't understand why people let this ruin their day when our athletics are doing so well.Sports are revolved around money now.
Fans will still continue to purchase tickets regardless what the name of the stadium is.
Seems kind of a pointless thing to get upset about but that’s just me.
What do you think they’re doing with the exterior? From the picture it looks like they’re just adding a bit of texture to it.According to Wikipedia, TBA originally cost $40M to construct, which is estimated to be roughly $103M by today's standards. So, $20M is roughly 1/5 of the adjusted construction cost, and that sounds like more than small beans to me. As others have said, updating the exterior alone more than makes up for any qualms with the renaming imo.
Staples center $700 mill over 20 years with Crypto.com. I would like to think we probably could’ve gotten $4-5 mill a year. Since it’s a large multi purpose facility it’s probably worth more than a lot of college football stadium naming rights.No. I did see Oakland sold theirs for $5 mill for 10 years. Unless we are hurting for fundraising this should be a last resort.
According to Wikipedia, TBA originally cost $40M to construct, which is estimated to be roughly $103M by today's standards. So, $20M is roughly 1/5 of the adjusted construction cost, and that sounds like more than small beans to me. As others have said, updating the exterior alone more than makes up for any qualms with the renaming imo.
I don't expect them to rebuild it or cover the exterior with a different one. I would guess some texture, a better color, and updated signage would go a long way. Don't get me wrong, I have no idea what the end product will be, but it's hard to imagine it won't improve.What do you think they’re doing with the exterior? From the picture it looks like they’re just adding a bit of texture to it.
Also I think building a TBA size/quality arena today would be closer to triple or quadruple that based on what our baseball stadium renovations cost.According to Wikipedia, TBA originally cost $40M to construct, which is estimated to be roughly $103M by today's standards. So, $20M is roughly 1/5 of the adjusted construction cost, and that sounds like more than small beans to me. As others have said, updating the exterior alone more than makes up for any qualms with the renaming imo.
1. Nobody will give a crap about the name. Itll still be Thompson Boling Arena in the same way that Heinz Field will still be Heinz Field.
2. If it means money for upgrades to make it a better experience, then that's great.
3. It's good to see us invest in the basketball program, which is pulling its weight right now too.
I see no downside to this. Im sure they'll come out with a "Pick 5" promotion for tickets lol
So we are getting 4x that?!No. I did see Oakland sold theirs for $5 mill for 10 years. Unless we are hurting for fundraising this should be a last resort.
I wonder if we'll be a trailblazer on that front, or wait until someone else does it first. Maybe I'm forgetting one but I don't think a big time program has done it yet to their stadium.
4x Oakland university’s arena is the standard?So we are getting 4x that?!
Kentucky football is getting $1.85m a year for football stadium naming rights, and we all know football is the money sport. $2m for hoops seems like a pretty solid deal to me.