hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
There's no point out there. Ann Coulter is no more a lawyer than Shaquille O'Neal is an actor. If you don't realize that most lobbyists and attorneys are just working for whoever pays them, not making some impassioned statement of their own beliefs, I would welcome you to join the rest of us in the real world.What does that have to do with anything? Don't dodge the point.
There's no point out there. Ann Coulter is no more a lawyer than Shaquille O'Neal is an actor. If you don't realize that most lobbyists and attorneys are just working for whoever pays them, not making some impassioned statement of their own beliefs, I would welcome you to join the rest of us in the real world.
you've defined her as far left and feminist. she wouldn't. but the argument isn't about the few who believe, whom everyone has agreed exist. the argument simply states that most of those in the debate are in it to be paid (and well), not because they are impassioned about the debate at hand.So you're telling me some far left feminist lawyer would line up to overturn Roe? What real world are you living in? The closest one is probably on MTV.
Exactly.you've defined her as far left and feminist. she wouldn't. but the argument isn't about the few who believe, whom everyone has agreed exist. the argument simply states that most of those in the debate are in it to be paid (and well), not because they are impassioned about the debate at hand.
holy shiznit, do I hear a poll brewing.Actually that's one person's argument. I've never said ALL. I've never said all in this so technically there shouldn't be an argument. Hat said that an overwhelming majority would argue the other side if the money was good. I'd like to know his percentage of overwhelming majority. I'd like to see some examples of those arguing abortion before SCOTUS and see who actually would switch sides.