Incipient
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 5,314
- Likes
- 30
Yesterday you used GA techs hiring habits as a reason we don't want to be like them. Pick one.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You do have to keep in mind what points he's making with those claims. I can't actually help you with that, because I don't understand what "Marshall is the low watermark of BCS jobs" means.
Who said anything about being a 15 beating a 2 seed as a criteria?
Yesterday you used GA techs hiring habits as a reason we don't want to be like them. Pick one.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Not the point. IE implied UT was at the bottom of the BCS schools looking for a coach if they hired Marshall. I was simply pointing out that UT isn't the only school looking at him. He also turned down the Iowa job last year.
Yes, in the first post hes saying we shouldn't want a coach because GT wants them.
In the 2nd post he's using Tech wanting a coach as evidence of the quality of that coach.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Yesterday you used GA techs hiring habits as a reason we don't want to be like them. Pick one.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Not the point. IE implied UT was at the bottom of the BCS schools looking for a coach if they hired Marshall. I was simply pointing out that UT isn't the only school looking at him. He also turned down the Iowa job last year.
Or blatant hypocrisy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
In simple terms -
Just becaust Ga Tech is interested in A doesn't mean we should be.
However, Coach B is a great coach and we better not F around to lose him.
Things can be mutually exclusive.
We wouldn't want a 15 seed coach to begin with.
Sportsbybrooks (spotty reliability, huge douche) is reporting that tech is offering Dayton's coach.
So, if we are keeping count and this guy is correct hat is wrong and hypocritical.
I am awaiting emain and tigervols response.
Posted via VolNation Mobile