Catbone
Hit me baby one more time
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 67,188
- Likes
- 65,030
I would be floored if that were to happen...the staff knows that Chandler is going to be the PG, they didn’t think that with Springer prior to the year. Also, Chandler is a PG, that’s all he’s played, not a 2 guard at all, he will walk in and run the shoe Day 1 imo.Would you not be surprised if Vescovi is the starting PG for at least the first couple games? Then see Chandler take over at some point? Similar to how both Springer and Chandler started the year coming off the bench.
You said the same about Springer and Keon when they were coming off the bench. That the staff knew they’d be in the starting lineup but they didn’t start the year off that way.I would be floored if that were to happen...the staff knows that Chandler is going to be the PG, they didn’t think that with Springer prior to the year. Also, Chandler is a PG, that’s all he’s played, not a 2 guard at all, he will walk in and run the shoe Day 1 imo.
No I didn’t? I said many times I thought 1 of them would start but wasn’t sure which, but that it ultimately wouldn’t matter because they’d all get similar minutes.You said the same about Springer and Keon when they were coming off the bench. That the staff knew they’d be in the starting lineup but they didn’t start the year off that way.
Last year when the season started and they were coming off the bench. You said the staff expected them to start at some point. Sooner than later. So I’m curious if it would be the same situation where we start the guys who are familiar w the offense and then work in the freshman to give some time before he’s startingNo I didn’t?