hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,488
- Likes
- 162,484
No, you said "dishonoring the nation" which is the same language used for other silent protests.You're changing the conversation. The athlete in question isn't talking about kneeling. They're talking about burning the flag.
No, you said "dishonoring the nation" BY BURNING THE FLAG AT THE OLYMPICS IN FRONT OF THE ENTIRE PLANET which is the same language used for other silent protests.
No one will burn a flag on the medal stand anyways. This person is barely an alternate
My point is the same language is being used to describe bothNewsflash, we all speak English, so we all use the same language. That's an irrelvant point to make. Burning your nation's flag at a world event of competing nations isn't the same as a bench warming qb kneeling for the national anthem. It just isn't.
Ah, so you're generalizing, putting upon me something others have said. I'll be honest, I don't agree with the kneeling, mostly because I'm not a fan of political statements at sporting events, but I do agree they have the right to do it as long as their employers are okay with it. Let's not forget, when they kneel at a football game, they are not on their own time. They are at work. Most businesses would probably fire people for making political statements while on the clock, but the NFL is a different beast. As long as the team owners are okay with it, they have the right to it. But I maintain my right not to like it.No, you said "dishonoring the nation" which is the same language used for other silent protests.
No one will burn a flag on the medal stand anyways. This person is barely an alternate
Depends on the people's view. Both are symbols. And there was a ton of critique at the time against Smith and Carlos. They were banned from further Olympic activities and nearly the entire US track team too. Time magazine described the fists as "angrier, nastier, uglier" in juxtaposition of the Olympic motto of "faster, stronger, higher"Yes really, because I don't see what those men did as dissing the country. Holding your fist up is a far cry from burning the flag.
That is flat out untrue (and That is Not my quote)Good for you.
We have the largest prison population in the world and a large fraction of that is non violent drug offenders. "At least we aren't China." Is not consolation
Not how it was viewed at the time. The fists were the most disruptive event during a medal ceremony according to some of the contemporary sources that covered the event.Yeah it was. Those guys did nothing disruptive and their protest was solemn and peaceful. Starting a fire on the medal stand is anything but peaceful.
That is flat out untrue (and That is Not my quote)
China‘s ACTUAL prison population is many times ours. Just because they are in „re-education camps“ instead of prison buildings doesn’t mean that Chinese Muslims, Christians, and dissidents aren’t also part of the prison population. I am sure the Third Reich didn’t have a very large „official“ prison population either once you removed the Labour camps from the tally. Don’t be naive please
No sir. My only argument was that you were making a false claim. Something you have yet to admit. Once you agree that you are in error, then we can proceed to the next phase of the discussion.So your argument is that we are not the worst, we are 2nd worst behind an authoritarian country with 4x our population? Wonderful!
You would be wrong. There's only one color orangeIf I said any one of these colors was "orange", I'd be using the same language to describe each of them, but they are OBVIOUSLY all different from eachother, right?
View attachment 376146
They were banned by the IOC, not the USOC. The USOC initially fought it, but caved when the entire U.S. track team was threatened with suspension. But when they returned to the U.S., they faced a horrible backlash, including death threats, not only to themselves, but also their families. I still say it is not an apt comparison to burning the flag.Depends on the people's view. Both are symbols. And there was a ton of critique at the time against Smith and Carlos. They were banned from further Olympic activities and nearly the entire US track team too. Time magazine described the fists as "angrier, nastier, uglier" in juxtaposition of the Olympic motto of "faster, stronger, higher"
they raised their fists during the national anthem, as representatives of the US.
Seems like people are just responding the recentness and forgetting what was actually going on.
Not how it was viewed at the time. The fists were the most disruptive event during a medal ceremony according to some of the contemporary sources that covered the event.
No sir. My only argument was that you were making a false claim. Something you have yet to admit. Once you agree that you are in error, then we can proceed to the next phase of the discussion.