Trump: He Could Easily Be Reelected

Exactly. They’ve realized that global elitist politics don’t serve everyday Americans. You need a CEO in the Oval Office, that puts America first, regardless of what the other powerful global elitist say or propogate.

Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

Also, anyone that thinks he's a good CEO is an idiot. He's had more turnover on his cabinet and staff in 1.5 years than anyone ever had in 8 years. All the qualified people he appointed have quit because he's a clown and in other key positions he's appointed less than qualified individuals.

So, no, he's not the CEO we need
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

Also, anyone that thinks he's a good CEO is an idiot. He's had more turnover on his cabinet and staff in 1.5 years than anyone ever had in 8 years. All the qualified people he appointed have quit because he's a clown and in other key positions he's appointed less than qualified individuals.

So, no, he's not the CEO we need

I'll bet you take your Cobra for a walk every morning before you come here to post your Resistance statements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

Also, anyone that thinks he's a good CEO is an idiot. He's had more turnover on his cabinet and staff in 1.5 years than anyone ever had in 8 years. All the qualified people he appointed have quit because he's a clown and in other key positions he's appointed less than qualified individuals.

So, no, he's not the CEO we need

How do you judge if a person is a good CEO?

I look at the bottom line and the strength of the company. What are you looking at?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
That has always been the Republican spin to avoid giving Bill Clinton any credit for winning the election but one simple fact shows that it isn't true:

Bill Clinton's lead in the polls over Bush remained between 3-5 percentage points from June until November of 1992 whether Ross Perot was in the race or not. You have to remember that Perot dropped out of the race in July but then returned in October. Although the overall numbers changed (from Clinton having a lead of 52-47% to 43-38% over Bush) the 3-5 point margin remained the same which clearly shows that Perot was taking votes away from Clinton and Bush evenly. It is also worth noting that Perot's best showing was in his home state of Texas which Bush won anyway. There is no evidence that Perot's presence in the campaign cost Bush any states at all in the 1992 election. The numbers clearly show this in spite of what Republicans want to believe.
Look, Bush would have won had it not been for Perot. How is that even being debated right now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

Also, anyone that thinks he's a good CEO is an idiot. He's had more turnover on his cabinet and staff in 1.5 years than anyone ever had in 8 years. All the qualified people he appointed have quit because he's a clown and in other key positions he's appointed less than qualified individuals.

So, no, he's not the CEO we need

Who is this "we" you speak of??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
How do you judge if a person is a good CEO?

I look at the bottom line and the strength of the company. What are you looking at?

Same thing, along with the stability of the staff and workers. Both retention and turnover rates.

Of course, being the POTUS encompasses so much more.

And I do know Trump isn't qualified nor could he have risen to an executive position at any Fortune 100 company. Example: On his worst day, Rex Tillerson forgot more about running an organization than TRump would know on his best day. I bring this up because many of our less than informed citizens actually believe TRump is doing a good job managing the executive branch
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

Also, anyone that thinks he's a good CEO is an idiot. He's had more turnover on his cabinet and staff in 1.5 years than anyone ever had in 8 years. All the qualified people he appointed have quit because he's a clown and in other key positions he's appointed less than qualified individuals.

So, no, he's not the CEO we need

I'm sure that hiring a bunch of ex CEO's accustomed to running their own show had nothing to do with it.

You're just another self-described "critical thinker". Amazing how many of those "critical thinkers have apeared in the last 18 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm sure that hiring a bunch of ex CEO's accustomed to running their own show had nothing to do with it.

You're just another self-described "critical thinker". Amazing how many of those "critical thinkers have apeared in the last 18 months.

Whatever...what I do know from this post of yours is that you have no idea as to anything you're talking about. I know if Rex Tillerson said Trump's a moron, then it's likely close to the truth.


Have you ever been on an executive staff for a Fortune 100 company?

It's funny how all you conservatives need to explain away Trump's impulsive, immature and insecure behavior. It's a f'ing joke this clown is POTUS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Whatever...what I do know from this post of yours is that you have no idea as to anything you're talking about. I know if Rex Tillerson said Trump's a moron, then it's likely close to the truth.


Have you ever been on an executive staff for a Fortune 100 company?

It's funny how all you conservatives need to explain away Trump's impulsive, immature and insecure behavior. It's a f'ing joke this clown is POTUS

He is still better than Reggie Love’s buddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Educational level is a decent indicator but we all know traditionally educated people who are morons and people with little to no traditional education that are brilliant. I would go with some combination of IQ, ability to reason, and wisdom.

The wisest person I ever knew was my mom's Aunt Alice. Born and raised in Rockwood TN as a coal miner's daughter. Not sure, but I doubt she went beyond 6th grade. I was about 18 when I first realized this as I overheard a conversation between a group of adults, many college educated, about a guy from Rockwood who had been arrested for murder.

For a lot of people, WWJD is their go to.

Mine is GAA; Go Ask Alice. (What would Alice say)

George Wallace supporters were on average low IQ, non thinkers.
Some were, some weren't. Some liked him for his tough law and order stance. Hillary, Obama and Trump all had several low I.Q. non thinkers. Every politician has them. They deserve representation just as much as you do.
 
Whatever...what I do know from this post of yours is that you have no idea as to anything you're talking about. I know if Rex Tillerson said Trump's a moron, then it's likely close to the truth.


Have you ever been on an executive staff for a Fortune 100 company?

It's funny how all you conservatives need to explain away Trump's impulsive, immature and insecure behavior. It's a f'ing joke this clown is POTUS

I haven’t and I can assure you haven’t even sniffed an executive anything position at any level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Trump's never been a real CEO. He owns his companies. He certainly hasn't risen to that status by moving up the ranks.

That's just nuts. How is it more noble to move up a corporate ladder than it is to be successful while putting your own money at risk?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I haven’t and I can assure you haven’t even sniffed an executive anything position at any level.

Your assurances would be wrong. I wasn't talking to you anyway.

JUst like a good little conservative, you think you know things about something for which you actually have no clue. WHATSOEVER!:birgits_giggle:
 
That's just nuts. How is it more noble to move up a corporate ladder than it is to be successful while putting your own money at risk?

It's much easier to buy a casino than working your ass off
while moving up the corporate ladder. Trump could have never attained CEO status at places like Exxon or GE
 
Your assurances would be wrong. I wasn't talking to you anyway.

JUst like a good little conservative, you think you know things about something for which you actually have no clue. WHATSOEVER!:birgits_giggle:

I feel good about my assumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
It's much easier to buy a casino than working your ass off
while moving up the corporate ladder. TRump could have never attained CEO status at places like Exxon or GE

You’re probably right, entrepreneurs generally don’t do well in strict corporate environments.
 

VN Store



Back
Top