Trump on Outkick this morning

[hog88]

Federal government could easily suggest measures or place the focus wherever it wants to, though. Legality has never stopped Trump from floating wild overreaches of government power before

The Fed government can suggest but has no power to enact, as a matter of fact I do believe several of the things you listed have been suggested by the federal government.

Thankfully Trump has just floated wild overreaches and hasn't acted like his predecessor did.

 

[MontyPython]

Clay isn't a dem, so he doesnt use though. Maybe he could borrow yours

 

[37L1]

View attachment 299656

Good thing there were no refills.

 

[NashVol11]

feds can't legally do much of what you listed. If they did they're would be demonstrations nationwide.

They can legally push any of those ideas. Trump floats far more illegal overreaches seemingly every other week. There were already "demonstrations," but 300-person protests with guns aren't what ended the lockdowns.

The less suspicion part is covered by their miraculous ability to find trillions at just the right time. That's what the feds constantly do.

Then it's not "covered" and you missed the point. That would apply to everything I listed; they could find trillions to make any of them sound better. For the others, the whole "you changed your mind" suspicion wouldn't exist in the first place.

Also, if their ultimate goal has been to control the populace going back forever, why not jump on the opportunity the first time masks are discussed?

 

[MontyPython]

Good thing there were no refills.

 

[37L1]

View attachment 299658

Not now, Cato!

 

[hog88]

They can legally push any of those ideas. Trump floats far more illegal overreaches seemingly every other week. There were already "demonstrations," but 300-person protests with guns aren't what ended the lockdowns.


Then it's not "covered" and you missed the point. That would apply to everything I listed; they could find trillions to make any of them sound better. For the others, the whole "you changed your mind" suspicion wouldn't exist in the first place.

Also, if their ultimate goal has been to control the populace going back forever, why not jump on the opportunity the first time masks are discussed?

Examples?

 

[utvolpj]

They can legally push any of those ideas. Trump floats far more illegal overreaches seemingly every other week. There were already "demonstrations," but 300 people with guns aren't what ended the lockdowns.

Again, bringing up dumb ideas and implementing them are 2 completely different things. They can't legally implement most of what you bring up. Maybe someone is smart enough to know that in dc

 

[NashVol11]

The Fed government can suggest but has no power to enact, as a matter of fact I do believe several of the things you listed have been suggested by the federal government.

Thankfully Trump has just floated wild overreaches and hasn't acted like his predecessor did.

Yeah that whole Muslim ban just didn't happen

 

[BeardedVol]

What are they if they are not opinions based on data?

I'm not sure what else to do for you man, I've given you the literal definition as to what those phrases mean. Do you need the definition of "opinion" be spelled out as well in reference to how it differs from a hypothesis?

An opinion is a statement describing a personal belief or thought that cannot be tested (or has not been tested) and is unsupported by evidence. A hypothesis is usually a prediction based on some observation or evidence. Hypotheses must be testable, and once tested, they can be supported by evidence. If a statement is made that cannot be tested and disproved, then it is not a hypothesis. Sometimes it is possible to restate an opinion so that it can become a hypothesis.
Practices of Science: Opinion, Hypothesis & Theory | manoa.hawaii.edu/ExploringOurFluidEarth.

 

[hog88]

Yeah that whole Muslim ban just didn't happen

Turned out it was legal. And that was a couple years ago, what about last week?

 

[NashVol11]

Again, bringing up dumb ideas and implementing them are 2 completely different things. They can't legally implement most of what you bring up. Maybe someone is smart enough to know that in dc

If your goal is instilling fear, you would be bringing up everything you can. Implementation is an artificial bar when you're talking about creating an atmosphere of fear. Did they implement a nationwide mask mandate?

 

[NashVol11]

Turned out it was legal. Next?

Um, no? They had like 3 EOs get overturned before they sufficiently rewrote it

 

[hog88]

If your goal is instilling fear, you would be bringing up everything you can. Implementation is an artificial bar when you're talking about creating an atmosphere of fear

That is happening in several states, fed government might be joining in if the WH was occupied by someone else.

 

[utvolpj]

If your goal is instilling fear, you would be bringing up everything you can. Implementation is an artificial bar when you're talking about creating an atmosphere of fear

Well they did bring it all up. Every part

 

[hog88]

Um, no? They had like 3 EOs get overturned before they sufficiently rewrote it

Ok what about last week, you said every other week. That was 2-3 years ago.

 

[NashVol11]

That is happening in several states, fed government might be joining in if the WH was occupied by someone else.

States want to control people but the megalomaniac President of the country doesn't, solid theory

 

[hog88]

States want to control people but the megalomaniac President of the country doesn't, solid theory

The proof is in the pudding isn't it?

 

[utvolpj]

States want to control people but the megalomaniac President of the country doesn't, solid theory

They can, he can't

 

[NashVol11]

Well they did bring it all up. Every part

But why place the most focus on the measure that least serves their purpose of fear/control, if that's the goal?

 

[utvolpj]

But why place the most focus on the measure that least serves their purpose of fear/control, if that's the goal?

Because Fauci discussing masks seemed trustworthy? Him suggesting curfews is not

 

[hog88]

But why place the most focus on the measure that least serves their purpose of fear/control, if that's the goal?

People started protesting the shutdowns. They had to back off of them.

 

[volbeast33]

I'm not sure what else to do for you man, I've given you the literal definition as to what those phrases mean. Do you need the definition of "opinion" be spelled out as well in reference to how it differs from a hypothesis?

An opinion is a statement describing a personal belief or thought that cannot be tested (or has not been tested) and is unsupported by evidence. A hypothesis is usually a prediction based on some observation or evidence. Hypotheses must be testable, and once tested, they can be supported by evidence. If a statement is made that cannot be tested and disproved, then it is not a hypothesis. Sometimes it is possible to restate an opinion so that it can become a hypothesis.
Practices of Science: Opinion, Hypothesis & Theory | manoa.hawaii.edu/ExploringOurFluidEarth.

See there it is..... you are just hung up on the word I chose..... I love science.... I see it as the constant search for knowledge which is something I believe strongly in..... It is, however, easy to manipulate the data that one chooses to use to come up with a hypothesis that matches that person’s biases..... I have seen it time and time again.

 

[DC_Vol]

Who/What do you believe?

I’m a data guy. I trust the numbers. Always distrustful of someone else’s interpretation, so I don’t really have a go to. I’m a skeptic by nature.

 

[ajvol01]

Which part? The scientific method or how the Trump administration bungled the coronavirus response prior to it ever beginning?

How do you feel about Cuomo?

Specifically about sending COVID+ patients into nursing homes?