lol.......I get a kick out of you guys advising me to think for myself. Whenever that is part of a post, it discounts pretty much everything else said.Why not? Surely they have proven to be immensely harmful. Surely we could save millions of lives by reducing lung/mouth cancer, liver disease, drunk driving accidents, etc.
At some point you have to start thinking for yourself about what makes sense, Luth, and not become a slave to established societal norms. We can't save everyone from themselves, and we have drawn this imaginary line in the sand with substances that are no more harmful than ones currently legal.
lol.......I get a kick out of you guys advising me to think for myself. Whenever that is part of a post, it discounts pretty much everything else said.
There will always be a line. Any person who thinks for themselves realizes that.
lol.......I get a kick out of you guys advising me to think for myself. Whenever that is part of a post, it discounts pretty much everything else said.
There will always be a line. Any person who thinks for themselves realizes that.
As I understand it, the difference us that there are statutes that expressly forbid doing that. It is also debatable whether its constitutional.
So you can argue whether what Obama did, or others did by executive order, was wise or within the general spirit of separation of powers whereas what Trump is doing is clearly unlawful.
How many people are now heroin addicts because they got started on the highly addictive pain medications that doctors over-prescribed, and then the addicts found something different? Lots of people have had their lives ruined by something that was legally prescribed to them despite pharmaceuticals knowing how dangerous these things were/are.Why not? Surely they have proven to be immensely harmful. Surely we could save millions of lives by reducing lung/mouth cancer, liver disease, drunk driving accidents, etc.
At some point you have to start thinking for yourself about what makes sense, Luth, and not become a slave to established societal norms. We can't save everyone from themselves, and we have drawn this imaginary line in the sand with substances that are no more harmful than ones currently legal.
He won't listen to this... and likely has or is about to tell you what a fool you are.Why not? Surely they have proven to be immensely harmful. Surely we could save millions of lives by reducing lung/mouth cancer, liver disease, drunk driving accidents, etc.
At some point you have to start thinking for yourself about what makes sense, Luth, and not become a slave to established societal norms. We can't save everyone from themselves, and we have drawn this imaginary line in the sand with substances that are no more harmful than ones currently legal.
How many people are now heroin addicts because they got started on the highly addictive pain medications that doctors over-prescribed, and then the addicts found something different? Lots of people have had their lives ruined by something that was legally prescribed to them despite pharmaceuticals knowing how dangerous these things were/are.
Their choice to put the drugs into their body. Nobody’s fault but the junkie.
Absolutely. I can think back to my time at UT, and my history, poli-sci, and philosophy courses had a massive liberal slant that at the time I was too young and impressionable to fully understand. Those professors had an agenda to indoctrinate.Colleges too. Liberals learned long ago to infiltrate, brainwash, influence. Everything they do is with nefarious means.
And that would be just fine if the rest of us didn't have to pay for it, but we always do. A real eye opener was reviewing TennCare hospitalizations and seeing things like indigent illegal aliens addicted to drugs in car wrecks for which their own medical care was well over $100K. We as citizens and taxpayers got to pay for those accidents (which even more directly directly involved others); the accident was likely caused directly by drugs and/or alcohol and poor choices, but we as taxpayers pay the bill.
I’ve written countless papers where I snickered and thought- I can’t believe I’m typing this.Absolutely. I can think back to my time at UT, and my history, poli-sci, and philosophy courses had a massive liberal slant that at the time I was too young and impressionable to fully understand. Those professors had an agenda to indoctrinate.
Yes, yes, yes. My sentiments exactly.
I was prescribed Gabapentin for nerve shocks down in my arm from neck disc degeneration. I filled the prescription, read all about it, and trashed it without opening the bag. I was prescribed hydrocodone or oxycodone or something years ago after having 4 wisdom teeth removed. I took one after developing a dry socket, got sicker than a dog with dry heaves, and trashed the rest of the pills.I always ask a lot of questions about any prescriptions and then choose myself whether to get them filled.
Most of them I’ve tossed in the trash. The only two I can remember getting filled since college was a round of antibiotics after an infection that wouldn’t go away and some oxy that I was happy to have while passing a kidney stone.
I was prescribed Gabapentin for nerve shocks down in my arm from neck disc degeneration. I filled the prescription, read all about it, and trashed it without opening the bag. I was prescribed hydrocodone or oxycodone or something years ago after having 4 wisdom teeth removed. I took one after developing a dry socket, got sicker than a dog with dry heaves, and trashed the rest of the pills.
It made the room spin around on me. I broke out in a sweat, and starting throwing up until I was empty, and then dry heaved for good measure. Never, ever again. I don't care how bad the pain gets. I remarked afterward that it apparently doesn't affect everybody that way or they would never be addicted to it.The oxycodone made me sick but I decided the sickness was better than the pain. Also stopped me up like concrete.
I could never figure out how one gets addicted to those pills, but I guess it does different things for different people.