carlos86
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,776
- Likes
- 6,986
I oppose both. Quit using the whatabouts to justify bad actions. Eventually it has to stopNeither should using your Pen and Phone to create a dreamers act that you have zero power to create . But somehow it was done . What one is allowed to do but the other isn’t is just ridiculous . Neither should be done but since when has that mattered ?
Neither should using your Pen and Phone to create a dreamers act that you have zero power to create . But somehow it was done . What one is allowed to do but the other isn’t is just ridiculous . Neither should be done but since when has that mattered ?
We should just switch to a parliamentary system with the executive being subordinate to the legislative.
When do I use it? We're talking about this example with this president. You either support the ability of all past and future presidents to use this as they see for or you don't. Using part actions you disagree with to justify the current action is laughableHow about stop giving me examples to use and I’ll stop referencing them , this isn’t some far away land long long ago it was the last president . You want to stop the whataboutism.. STOP DOING IT .
I don't love doing it this way but none of you whined when barry went around Congress, so what goes around comes around. Second, when the other side is determined to have open borders someone has to lead and act on securing them
When do I use it? We're talking about this example with this president. You either support the ability of all past and future presidents to use this as they see for or you don't. Using part actions you disagree with to justify the current action is laughable
Actually it's not ok for either of them. It's ok to admit Trump is wrongI didn’t justify anything read the “ in case of fire “ part of my previous post . What I said was being ok for one to circumvent congress because he couldn’t get it done and creating a power that he didn’t have to get it done , to me is worse than Trump declaring just another SOE .
I don't like the idea but the dems were never going to sign off and the Senate was not filibuster proof.Because it's a transparent subversion of Congressional power as outlined in Article 1. It's also hard to sell something as a national emergency a month after you had both houses of Congress but didn't do anything about it.
my boy Barry? Good griefAre you sure you read my posts or do you just assume I say yay Trump MAGA and tell me to stop bringing your boy Barry up as an example of what we should never allow to happen ?
Honestly they would attempt those things regardless of what Trump is doing today. However Trump isn’t circumventing the constitution. And declaring a national emergency to what is supposed to be a global problem doesn’t make much sense. Securing our borders to deter illegal immigration and fight against drugs and human trafficking makes sense. It’s long overdue.