TrumPutinGate

#14,028
#14,028
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,029
#14,029
carlos86 said:
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is working with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on its investigation into Paul Manafort and his financial transactions, according to several people familiar with the matter.

The cooperation is the latest indication that the federal probe into President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman is intensifying. It also could potentially provide Mueller with additional leverage to get Manafort to cooperate in the larger investigation into Trump’s campaign, as Trump does not have pardon power over state crimes.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/30/manafort-mueller-probe-attorney-general-242191
Click to expand...

So after months the Muller team is now leaking info? Or is this all just speculation?
 
#14,036
#14,036
MT LeConte said:
Yes
Click to expand...

I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.
Click to expand...

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
Click to expand...

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain
Click to expand...

With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.
Click to expand...

Because she was not using a government account
Click to expand...

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
Click to expand...

then you did not pay attention or are being incredibly dishonest. It doesn't matter if she intended to break the law. she did. When we are locking up soldiers for doing this once. Yet she is innocent for doing it about 100+ times? GTFO!

If Trump does this same thing I hope he gets locked up for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#14,037
#14,037
LouderVol said:
then you did not pay attention or are being incredibly dishonest. It doesn't matter if she intended to break the law. she did. When we are locking up soldiers for doing this once. Yet she is innocent for doing it about 100+ times? GTFO!

If Trump does this same thing I hope he gets locked up for it.
Click to expand...

But that's not what Comey said. Those are your words. You and I don't have the authority or resources to investigate crimes ourselves. So I'll accept the findings of the person who does have the authority and you can take the word of Sean Hannity
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,039
#14,039
MT LeConte said:
But that's not what Comey said. Those are your words. You and I don't have the authority or resources to investigate crimes ourselves. So I'll accept the findings of the person who does have the authority and you can take the word of Sean Hannity
Click to expand...

That is what Comey said. He listed a bunch of stuff that she did, breaking the law; and then advised that charges not be made. That is in no way shape or form the same as innocence.

Imagine what you would feel like if Mueller comes out and says. "We have proof that Trump colluded, he straight up took money from the Russian government and worked with them to become President. We have proof that Trump himself directed Russia to change votes, it actually happened. But we don't believe he intended to break the law, so I am not advising charges be brought against him at this time."

would you or anyone with half a brain assume Trump was innocent after that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,041
#14,041
MT LeConte said:
But that's not what Comey said. Those are your words. You and I don't have the authority or resources to investigate crimes ourselves. So I'll accept the findings of the person who does have the authority and you can take the word of Sean Hannity
Click to expand...


"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."

"None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at agencies and departments of the United States government -- or even with a commercial email service like Gmail."

"Only a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked 'classified' in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."

If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,042
#14,042
Hayezb said:
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."

"None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at agencies and departments of the United States government -- or even with a commercial email service like Gmail."

"Only a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked 'classified' in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."

If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail.
Click to expand...



"If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail" is conjecture. Comey never said that.

My argument is that Comey never said she was guilty of anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#14,043
#14,043
MT LeConte said:
"If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail" is conjecture. Comey never said that.

My argument is that Comey never said she was guilty of anything.
Click to expand...

Comey was told by Lynch to call it a "matter" too. So I doubt he will use the word "guilty".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,044
#14,044
MT LeConte said:
"If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail" is conjecture. Comey never said that.

My argument is that Comey never said she was guilty of anything.
Click to expand...

That's my argument too. He danced all around the word "guilty" because he wasn't allowed to say it. She was guilty and everybody knows it, some are just in denial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,045
#14,045
MT LeConte said:
"If the last name wasn't Clinton that person would be in jail" is conjecture. Comey never said that.

My argument is that Comey never said she was guilty of anything.
Click to expand...

you are right he never said she was GUILTY, jesus christ fixating on a word much? All he did was outline all the illegal things she ACTUALLY did with the evidence they had.
 
#14,047
#14,047
Anybody would have to be a complete dumbass to either run for office as a Republican, or work for a Republican. If you survive the inquisition, your legal bills will bust you out. If you are a Democrat, at least you don't have the media all over you, and you will have 100% support of your colleagues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,048
#14,048
LouderVol said:
That is what Comey said. He listed a bunch of stuff that she did, breaking the law; and then advised that charges not be made. That is in no way shape or form the same as innocence.

Imagine what you would feel like if Mueller comes out and says. "We have proof that Trump colluded, he straight up took money from the Russian government and worked with them to become President. We have proof that Trump himself directed Russia to change votes, it actually happened. But we don't believe he intended to break the law, so I am not advising charges be brought against him at this time."

would you or anyone with half a brain assume Trump was innocent after that?
Click to expand...

Isn't it funny how liberals view reality?
 
#14,050
#14,050
carlos86 said:
[twitter]https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/903394723343237125[/twitter]
Click to expand...

“When CI brings a case to a U.S. Attorney, it is done. It’s wrapped up with a ribbon and a bow. It’s just comprehensive.”
- Martin Sheil, a retired IRS Criminal Investigations agent.


12-the-accountant.w1200.h630.jpg
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top