Urban challenging Slive?

#76
#76
The_Nuzzler_and_the_Gouger.gif

:eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
#77
#77
Before we pass judgement, I'll need to examine the transcripts of both Slive's comments and Meyer's comments. I'm guessing I'll find that Meyer didn't violate the edict since he didn't use the word "referee" in his comments and he's right that a flag should have been thrown. If anything, he probably deserves to be commended for helping the refs understand the rules of the game and is providing constructive criticism. However, I don't want to get ahead of myself and congratulate Meyer for his fine work since I'm an objective observer and no one else on this board is.

---signed LG
 
#79
#79
Before we pass judgement, I'll need to examine the transcripts of both Slive's comments and Meyer's comments. I'm guessing I'll find that Meyer didn't violate the edict since he didn't use the word "referee" in his comments and he's right that a flag should have been thrown. If anything, he probably deserves to be commended for helping the refs understand the rules of the game and is providing constructive criticism. However, I don't want to get ahead of myself and congratulate Meyer for his fine work since I'm an objective observer and no one else on this board is.
---signed LG
You need to add five more paragraphs of whiny nonsense to that post...THEN you can sign it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#80
#80
Before we pass judgement, I'll need to examine the transcripts of both Slive's comments and Meyer's comments. I'm guessing I'll find that Meyer didn't violate the edict since he didn't use the word "referee" in his comments and he's right that a flag should have been thrown. If anything, he probably deserves to be commended for helping the refs understand the rules of the game and is providing constructive criticism. However, I don't want to get ahead of myself and congratulate Meyer for his fine work since I'm an objective observer and no one else on this board is.

---signed LG

So everyone in my office thinks I am crazy now! I laughed out loud...:post-4-1090547912:
 
#93
#93
do we need half of the comments on this about there being another thread of this? i thought one would suffice. He didnt see it, big deal. At any rate, didnt the SEC put a new policy in to suspend a coach if he says something about officials this year? Any coach i believe it was...
 
#94
#94
Before we pass judgement, I'll need to examine the transcripts of both Slive's comments and Meyer's comments. I'm guessing I'll find that Meyer didn't violate the edict since he didn't use the word "referee" in his comments and he's right that a flag should have been thrown. If anything, he probably deserves to be commended for helping the refs understand the rules of the game and is providing constructive criticism. However, I don't want to get ahead of myself and congratulate Meyer for his fine work since I'm an objective observer and no one else on this board is.

---signed LG

You forgot to imply that all Tennessee fans are racists because some posters want to punish a black man.
 
#95
#95
Did you look in the “NCAA” forum (where this belongs) as opposed to this, the “UT Football” forum?
BTW..I was looking for the NCAA forum and could not find it too start a thread. Where the heck is it!!!??
 
#97
#97
given the new 'kiffin rules' implemented by slive this d-bag should be suspended but he wont be. he wont even be reprimanded because they(cryer and slime) are bed fellows with the same agenda.
 
Remember, the rule said that Slive had the "discretion" to suspend or fine. Since this is CUM, I'd say he will "discreetly" ignore the comment.
 

VN Store



Back
Top