US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

[0nelilreb]

It is a legitimate question for any President. It is super extra legitimate with Trump.

It’s pure speculation on your part . Sucking at the the MSM tit too long will do that .

 

[SmokyRiverDog]

Straights of Hormuz, price of oil gonna jump.

Is this an anti-LGBTQ group?

 

[1972 Grad]

Those of us with more than a few years of life expectancy may have to worry about the consequences of yet another protracted conflict.

Thanks for reminding me of my age as we are burying my wife's father Sunday.

 

[Mick]

No way. Trump is a Russian stooge, remember?

I remember him withholding aid to Ukraine and Giving Russia the border area between Turkey and Syria. Just remember no matter how much Trump bows to Putin, Russia is still our enemy.

 

[1972 Grad]

I remember him withholding aid to Ukraine and Giving Russia the border area between Turkey and Syria. Just remember no matter how much Trump bows to Putin, Russia is still our enemy.

Not what your savior Obama told Romney in the debate.

 

[Mick]

Not what your savior Obama told Romney in the debate.

Did Obama say Russia is not our enemy during the debate 8 years ago?

 

[n_huffhines]

What if he starts a war and then uncle joe takes over?...

 

[Hunerwadel]

Orangeman playing 3D chess with a 2D mind again. IMO there was no sense in this attack. Iran has a hundred cockroaches ready to take his place.

 

[n_huffhines]

"Weasel out"?

And yes, it is up to Iran whether or not there is a war between our countries.

What are you asking? Are you unfamiliar with the term? It means Trump dishonorably backed out of an agreement our country had made.

 

[1972 Grad]

Did Obama say Russia is not our enemy during the debate 8 years ago?

I think it was something like the .......................1980's called and want their foreign policy back.

 

[NashVol11]

Thanks for reminding me of my age as we are burying my wife's father Sunday.

Sorry for your loss, man. I can’t imagine what it’s like to lose a parent

 

[lawgator1]

It’s pure speculation on your part . Sucking at the the MSM tit too long will do that .

We saw him do it in Ukraine less than 6 months ago -- place his own interests above the US interest. It is perfectly legitimate to ask whether political benefit paid a role in his decision on this, too.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Thanks for reminding me of my age as we are burying my wife's father Sunday.

Given your interactions with people on here, expecting anyone to take back an insult towards you is about as absurd as my asking for the same.

If you dish it, you gotta take it. Now, with that said...

What's the protocol for in-laws here... do I get a "sorry for your loss" or a congratulatory card?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Orangeman playing 3D chess with a 2D mind again. IMO there was no sense in this attack. Iran has a hundred cockroaches ready to take his place.

Why yes, they do........I don't see why all the fuss over one/two dead A-holes when there's 1,000s in the wings...

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Why yes, they do........I don't see why all the fuss over one/two dead A-holes when there's 1,000s in the wings...

We have a metric shitload of generals. Would you be saying this if a nation with whom we have an already tense relationship had been responsible for this and it was one of ours?

Best case scenario is that this stops just short of a big ass military conflict in the ME.

 

[Mick]

I think it was something like the .......................1980's called and want their foreign policy back.

You could have said no Obama didn't say what I said he said.

 

[TheDeeble]

Why yes, they do........I don't see why all the fuss over one/two dead A-holes when there's 1,000s in the wings...

Because this isn't just another terrorist. He was Iranian military leadership.

As mentioned earlier this would be like someone taking out our Secretary of Defense, head of CIA, or combination of both possibly based on all the things Soleimani was running.

 

[hog88]

What are you asking? Are you unfamiliar with the term? It means Trump dishonorably backed out of an agreement our country had made.

Bad contracts need to be broken.

 

[hog88]

We have a metric shitload of generals. Would you be saying this if a nation with whom we have an already tense relationship had been responsible for this and it was one of ours?

Best case scenario is that this stops just short of a big ass military conflict in the ME.

Would depend on what said general was doing. Of course just like the Iranians we’d never be told the truth.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Bad contracts need to be broken.

Not at the expense of diplomatic reliability on the global stage. This is an obtuse way of rationalizing this.

 

[Mick]

Bad contracts need to be broken.

You can't call it bad just because Trump did. Look where it got us. Just take a gander out of your hole and look. Is this "good"?

 

[hog88]

Not at the expense of diplomatic reliability on the global stage. This is an obtuse way of rationalizing this.

We lost no diplomatic reliability in breaking this agreement. Whether they will admit it or not all parties involved knew it was a crap deal.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Would depend on what said general was doing. Of course just like the Iranians we’d never be told the truth.

I guess he should have taken the train.

 

[lawgator1]

What if he starts a war and then uncle joe takes over?...

View attachment 251445

Anyone who does not question Trump's motives on this is simply naive.

 

[hog88]

I guess he should have taken the train.

He probably shouldn’t have been meeting with terrorist leaders.