US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

He probably shouldn’t have been meeting with terrorist leaders.

You're so shallow on thought its funny.
181220095448-01-kim-trump-singapore-file-exlarge-169.jpg
 
Because this isn't just another terrorist. He was Iranian military leadership.

As mentioned earlier this would be like someone taking out our Secretary of Defense, head of CIA, or combination of both possibly based on all the things Soleimani was running.

Ok. Next man up....they have hundreds right behind him to fill in the gap. Good Terrorist is a Dead Terrorist.
 
Ok. Next man up....they have hundreds right behind him to fill in the gap. Good Terrorist is a Dead Terrorist.
You asked what the fuss is an why people are making a big deal out of it. I told you. A strike against him isn't a normal event, even with us drone striking hundreds/thousands over the past decade.
 
The UN is not an organization to worry about or take seriously.

I could make a joke at how dumb and arrogant this is, but it's low hanging fruit. It's the largest international diplomatic platform so if they say this is a human rights violation, it's not a good look.
 
Again for the 10th time it depends on what said general was doing?

No, it doesn't. You would justify whatever said general was doing and demand that we turn Iran into crater. It was an act of war by the US. Whether it was a good move or a bad one remains to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
I could make a joke at how dumb and arrogant this is, but it's low hanging fruit. It's the largest international diplomatic platform so if they say this is a human rights violation, it's not a good look.

The UN is toothless and impotent, so I can see why you’d align yourself with that joke of an organization.
 
"[The Congress shall have Power...] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

--U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 11.
 
Do you think that this is the first time that we've been able to get him?

Or that this is the first time where Trump thought that the benefit to him, personally, was worth the risk to everyone else?
personally I believe this was the first time he was in the city where one of our embassys was attacked making plans with other fellow bad people to further attack it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
A lot of people are wondering what was Soleimani doing in Iraq and what was his relationship with the Iraqi government. Qasem Soleimani and Iran gained huge amounts of influence in Iraq because they were the first to respond to the ISIS in Iraq. Both Abu Mahdi al-Mohandas and Soleimani took part in planning and executing the campaign to recapture Mosul.
What anti ISIS campaign were they helping execute in a Baghdadi airport?

Stalin was fighting Hitler before we were. Doesnt make him a good person.
 
The UN is toothless and impotent, so I can see why you’d align yourself with that joke of an organization.

Recognition is alignment?

I would normally take your word as bond in terms of toothlessness and impotence, since you're probably our resident expert on both, but it's hard to comprehend what you're trying to communicate at times because of the abrasive and loud sound of two orange, wrinkly lumps constantly being gargled in your mouth.
 
No, it doesn't. You would justify whatever said general was doing and demand that we turn Iran into crater. It was an act of war by the US. Whether it was a good move or a bad one remains to be seen.

If one of our Generals was behind an attack on a foreign embassy and was meeting with the leader of the group that attacked it I would chalk it up to he got caught.
 
personally I believe this was the first time he was in the city where one of our embassys was attacked making plans with other fellow bad people to further attack it.

Why would you hold this belief? Maybe he was at Benghazi.
 

VN Store



Back
Top