DinkinFlicka
Erect Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 29,773
- Likes
- 24,888
Because this isn't just another terrorist. He was Iranian military leadership.
As mentioned earlier this would be like someone taking out our Secretary of Defense, head of CIA, or combination of both possibly based on all the things Soleimani was running.
You asked what the fuss is an why people are making a big deal out of it. I told you. A strike against him isn't a normal event, even with us drone striking hundreds/thousands over the past decade.Ok. Next man up....they have hundreds right behind him to fill in the gap. Good Terrorist is a Dead Terrorist.
I could make a joke at how dumb and arrogant this is, but it's low hanging fruit. It's the largest international diplomatic platform so if they say this is a human rights violation, it's not a good look.
personally I believe this was the first time he was in the city where one of our embassys was attacked making plans with other fellow bad people to further attack it.Do you think that this is the first time that we've been able to get him?
Or that this is the first time where Trump thought that the benefit to him, personally, was worth the risk to everyone else?
What anti ISIS campaign were they helping execute in a Baghdadi airport?A lot of people are wondering what was Soleimani doing in Iraq and what was his relationship with the Iraqi government. Qasem Soleimani and Iran gained huge amounts of influence in Iraq because they were the first to respond to the ISIS in Iraq. Both Abu Mahdi al-Mohandas and Soleimani took part in planning and executing the campaign to recapture Mosul.
The UN is toothless and impotent, so I can see why you’d align yourself with that joke of an organization.
No, it doesn't. You would justify whatever said general was doing and demand that we turn Iran into crater. It was an act of war by the US. Whether it was a good move or a bad one remains to be seen.