US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

[Sandman 423]

Wait, now Soleimani was the world's leading sponsor of terrorism?

How do these Saudis escape such scrutiny?

 

[0nelilreb]

Timing and target is odd in light of what trump believed in 2011.

Umm do you still believe everything you did in 2011?

 

[hog88]

Timing and target is odd in light of what trump believed in 2011.

Blah, Blah

Was the timing of Desert Fox odd also? Or how about our help in overthrowing Qaddafi?

 

[LouderVol]

Timing and target is odd in light of what trump believed in 2011.

Nothing changes in a decade or when one becomes president :eyeroll:

 

[ClearwaterVol]

So Americans are questioning why we killed a someone that has killed Americans?SMH.

I think the question is what proof has been provided that he was planning an imminent attack? You guys just keep repeating the company line while some ask questions. You worship a knucklehead that has repeatedly denied US intelligence when it came to N. Korea and Russia, but now we are supposed to accept his word? GTFOH

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Umm do you still believe everything you did in 2011?

he thought a desperate president could attack Iran to win the white house in an election that was less than a year out.

 

[0nelilreb]

he thought a desperate president could attack Iran to win the white house in an election that was less than a year out.

You avoiding the question?
Edit : he didn’t attack Iran.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

You avoiding the question?
Edit : he didn’t attack Iran.

Trump did.

 

[hog88]

Trump did.

Trump didn't attack Iran and quit deflecting. You know what he's taking about.

 

[0nelilreb]

Trump did.

No , he killed a very dangerous terrorist. You still didn’t answer .. do you still believe everything you did in 2011?

 

[KB5252]

Trump did.

He attacked a terrorist operating in a foreign country technically. He didn't attack a country. If the country offended believes it was an attack on them perhaps they should stop sponsoring terror activities in Iraq.

 

[Mick]

You avoiding the question?
Edit : he didn’t attack Iran.

Iran doesn't see it that way.

 

[0nelilreb]

Iran doesn't see it that way.

So .

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Trump didn't attack Iran and quit deflecting. You know what he's taking about.

He assassinated one of their top generals. He did attack Iran. To view any other way is being willfully blind.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

He attacked a terrorist operating in a foreign country technically. He didn't attack a country. If the country offended believes it was an attack on them perhaps they should stop sponsoring terror activities in Iraq.

You realize, of course, that through much of the middle east the US is view as terrorists? Killing our generals is therefore acceptable and should not be viewed as an attack on the US. Again, GTFOH

 

[hog88]

He assassinated one of their top generals. He did attack Iran. To view any other way is being willfully blind.

I guess Iran should have kept him at home and bared him from spreading terrorism.

 

[hog88]

You realize, of course, that through much of the middle east the US is view as terrorists? Killing our generals is therefore acceptable and should not be viewed as an attack on the US. Again, GTFOH

You think they haven't tried?

 

[0nelilreb]

He assassinated one of their top generals. He did attack Iran. To view any other way is being willfully blind.

Anybody now from another country that attacks any American is attacking America? Cool , things would get interesting under that ideology.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Anybody now from another country that attacks any American is attacking America? Cool , things would get interesting under that ideology.

top general vs. any american - try to keep up instead of creating straw men.

 

[allvol123]

I think the question is what proof has been provided that he was planning an imminent attack? You guys just keep repeating the company line while some ask questions. You worship a knucklehead that has repeatedly denied US intelligence when it came to N. Korea and Russia, but now we are supposed to accept his word? GTFOH

Dont care about imminent attack. He already has past actions on his hands. He was available in a place where we can get him annihilated without loss of innocent lives.

Job well done.

 

[KB5252]

You realize, of course, that through much of the middle east the US is view as terrorists? Killing our generals is therefore acceptable and should not be viewed as an attack on the US. Again, GTFOH

They try on the battlefield but can't, which is exactly where we killed this terrorist. If you think he was there for any reason other than working against our interests and planning/ organizing attacks on our people and allies then we can't possibly have a discussion on this topic unless you have evidence to the contrary.

 

[hog88]

top general vs. any american - try to keep up instead of creating straw men.

Any of our generals plotting, financing or conspiring with terrorist groups?

 

[allvol123]

You realize, of course, that through much of the middle east the US is view as terrorists? Killing our generals is therefore acceptable and should not be viewed as an attack on the US. Again, GTFOH

Let some try it.

 

[0nelilreb]

top general vs. any american - try to keep up instead of creating straw men.

Terrorist hiding under security of a flag vs any American I’m up to speed .

 

[ClearwaterVol]

I guess Iran should have kept him at home and bared him from spreading terrorism.

So a quick and dirty attack on General August while he dines at Weberstübchen would be fair game. After all, we could have kept him home.