kptvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 27,294
- Likes
- 1
it would be nice if you'd just answer the questions asked, insted of going off on some other tangent every other page.I'm through arguing with you. You draw too many insane conclusions. It's like arguing with a drunk.
I've stated my case. Everyone here is free to agree or disagree.
There are worthy contenders other than conference champions.
it would be nice if you'd just answer the questions asked, insted of going off on some other tangent every other page.
and believe me, i wish i was drunk...........
I'm through arguing with you. You draw too many insane conclusions. It's like arguing with a drunk.
I've stated my case. Everyone here is free to agree or disagree.
There are worthy contenders other than conference champions.
I do find it funny that you act like I have something to prove when the system already supports my line of thinking. Obviously someone agrees with me.
of course not, give teams as many chances as possible...that TN/FL game, or FL/GA game or OU/TX game, ah, just one game, no big deal if you win or lose, you'll all get another shot in the end....no worries.Based on the fact that one game is one game. It doesn't make a season.
:thumbsup:I do find it funny that you act like I have something to prove when the system already supports my line of thinking. Obviously someone agrees with me.
:salute:[/b]
I agree completely, but who gets to say who's more desevrving? The media who rank teams who lose to others teams higher than the team that beat them? The coaches, who have very vested interest and bias with power in their votes (vote a team that you beat higher than a team with the same record that you don't play makes your schedule look better), computers? flawed as the people who program them. Thus my argument for an inclusion of all teams in conferences and only path to playoff is through a conference championship.:hi:
[/b]
Thus my argument for an inclusion of all teams in conferences and only path to playoff is through a conference championship.:hi:
:banghead2: and we're back to the popularity contest.The only way I could agree with that, (and I'm sure you don't care if I agree or not, but just putting my opinion out there,) is if they determined conference champs by record, and not one game at the end of the season, especially because it could be a rematch. Also, in no way should a CUSA champ get a spot over the 2nd best SEC team, so you would have to exclude mid majors with that idea, or force them to join a conference that people care about.