UT Football.Is it plausible to believe we can win it all?

#380
#380
tvolsfan said:
The only way I could agree with that, (and I'm sure you don't care if I agree or not, but just putting my opinion out there,) is if they determined conference champs by record, and not one game at the end of the season, especially because it could be a rematch. Also, in no way should a CUSA champ get a spot over the 2nd best SEC team, so you would have to exclude mid majors with that idea, or force them to join a conference that people care about.
Click to expand...
all conferences should have their "shot" , the playoff system will quickly seperate the wheat from the chaff, and who knows a conference USA team might run the table, and wouldn't that be just as exciting as watching the "Jones Valley Beer and Bait Shop" bowl on December the 3rd?
 
#381
#381
tvolsfan said:
CUSA sucks get over it.
Click to expand...
i don't disagree. but your basis of argument is simply on who you "think" is good. it doesn't matter if it's true or not. cast them aside because they are CUSA......not because of anything they failed to do during the season.
 
#382
#382
jakez4ut said:
If TN doesn't win it, they don't play in the SEC title game. that's what it meant.
Click to expand...

But what about the whole 2nd chance thing? How come LSU gets a 2nd chance but not UT.

UT in the SEC was 7-2.
LSU was 6-3.

They were 1-1 head to head. So what made LSU better?

Plus if UT lost that game they still would have gotten in.
 
#386
#386
OrangeEmpire said:
Would we all agree that the major conferences should have a championship game?
Click to expand...
I'm absolutely against the championship game. It invalidates the body of work nature of the regular season, which should decide champions. The introduction of mega conferences has generated the need for the game, but it hurts those conferences that have it IMO
 
#389
#389
jakez4ut said:
i don't disagree. but your basis of argument is simply on who you "think" is good. it doesn't matter if it's true or not. cast them aside because they are CUSA......not because of anything they failed to do during the season.
Click to expand...

Or they could just take the top 8 teams, an do a playoff based on ranking. If the CUSA champ gets to the top 8, then let them in.
 
#390
#390
BigPapaVol said:
I'm absolutely against the championship game. It invalidates the body of work nature of the regular season, which should decide champions. The introduction of mega conferences has generated the need for the game, but it hurts those conferences that have it IMO
Click to expand...

You don't like the one and done scenario?

Do you like it for basketball?
 
#392
#392
volmanjr said:
all conferences should have their "shot" , the playoff system will quickly seperate the wheat from the chaff, and who knows a conference USA team might run the table, and wouldn't that be just as exciting as watching the "Jones Valley Beer and Bait Shop" bowl on December the 3rd?
Click to expand...
just bumping this thought in case you missed it because I type sooooo slow.
 
#397
#397
tvolsfan said:
But what about the whole 2nd chance thing? How come LSU gets a 2nd chance but not UT.

UT in the SEC was 7-2.
LSU was 6-3.

They were 1-1 head to head. So what made LSU better?

Plus if UT lost that game they still would have gotten in.
Click to expand...
do i really have to do this again?

the SEC has two divisions, the East and West........they each have division winners, and they play for the SEC title.

and what made LSU better was they beat TN in the title game.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top