govols/cc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,553
- Likes
- 1,366
First of all, the band started decades before the football team, so literally yes. Without the existence of the football team, the band would still exist.
All 100k are there to watch football. I never said that they weren't. I said that the band is there to enhance the experience. The stupid point you're trying to make is invalid.
The football revenue supports the band. How would the band continue its current makeup without the football team?
So your argument about the band existing without the football team is as invalid as the point you are disputing.
It's easy to understand why so many are upset about the changes that will be made. But let's be honest about the significance of the band minus rocky top, fight song, and pre-game. Anyone who disputes that is in the minority.
For years, you could look at the Pride in the stands at Neyland and feel the apathy. There was no caring. Half-assed, cappy hornflashes by half of the band during half of the crappy songs for upwards of a decade? Sit there acting apathetic for that long and suddenly the AD is gonna have to make a change to put life back into the music in Neyland.
The Pride shows that it doesn't care about in-stand playing for years, then suddenly cares so much once that privilege is revoked. Devote more time and more effort to playing better in the stands: better songs with more excitement, less apathy, and more flashes.
THAT'S how you save the Pride. Raise the bar. Excite the fans. Don't ride the coattails of the fans that are excited in spite of you.
Just look at the title of the other thread:
Cutting the band!!!! Are you kidding me!!!!
The over-reaction was right in the title.
Interesting because it was very similar to yours.
Argue for no reason much?
How so? Just curious.