InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 60,468
- Likes
- 142,129
It is. There is literally no difference in those who took the vaccine and those who didn’t.Unless it's happeneing at the same rate to those who took the vbaccine,
Your right, because that simply isn't true. Sweden alone proves that. They didn't have the same rate of these conditions. Your answer has much more to do with defending your position then the actual results. The MRNA "Vaccines" did not show ANY IMPROVEMENT for fending off covid. There is quite a bit of evidence showing they weakened immune systems making both that condition worse and many others worse. That is all before we look at the DNA conatmination leading to turbo cancers, and the other issues with the hastily run out MRNA technology. However you will never accept that, because of cognitive dissonance. You really are not in the position you think you are to be smug.It is. There is literally no difference in those who took the vaccine and those who didn’t.
You would likely be better off today had you taken the vaccine as people who became extremely ill are more likely to experience symptoms than those who didn’t.
But that was your choice.
What color is the sky in your world?Using Sweden as an example actually proves Slice's point.
Sweden's death rate decreased from 2019 to 2024 and they were one of the most vaccinated countries in the world....
It does prove the lockdowns were stupid and ineffective.
So it doesn't bother you that he took his 'gain of function' research to an openly hostile country. What is 'gain of function' research anyway? Care to opine on that? Is it necessary to take an normally benign pathogen and supercharge it to lethal levels to study it?That he did his job the best he could and was made out to be some super villain by open mouth breathing idiots.