Really nice figure from that mmwr showing that vaccine still shows decent efficacy against contracting covid.
View attachment 389096
What would be some reasoning for partially vaccinated beating fully vaccinated?
Really nice figure from that mmwr showing that vaccine still shows decent efficacy against contracting covid.
View attachment 389096
Huh? For saying you broke Godwin's Law?
For all you know, I actually agree with you. And I can agree with you and still call you out on Godwin's Law.
No, for using an internet adage created by the social engineers that was created to attempt to discredit anyone calling out government or companies who are or might be pushing nazi agendas. You people really have no clue how the social engineers mold and manipulate your minds. Which is one reason why you all are being completely enslaved.
Manipulating a deadly virus in a lab, releasing it out on the population, then forcing everyone to get a "vaccine" created by the same globalist who released the virus. Subsequently relinquishing all of your god given rights which in return makes you their SLAVE. That is a satanic trash ass nazi agenda...got it?Please specify what a Nazi agenda is.
One of the editors suggested maybe a combination of exposure risk (people like healthcare workers more likely to be double vaccinated than single vaccinated at this point, etc) and doing age-adjustment incidence comparisons when you have a much smaller cohort group (partially vaccinated). Hospital rates remained slightly higher in the partial group.What would be some reasoning for partially vaccinated beating fully vaccinated?
Manipulating a deadly virus in a lab, releasing it out on the population, then forcing everyone to get a "vaccine" created by the same globalist who released the virus. Subsequently relinquishing all of your god given rights which in return makes you their SLAVE. That is a satanic trash ass nazi agenda...got it?
A little hyperbole there Chief. We can't throw you off for 'any reason we want'.That's (the death penalty) a different scenario, of course it requires a legal basis to impose. You don't have the legal or Constitutionally protected "right" to fly, so stop calling it a "right." It's not, you can tell by the way they can throw your ass off a plane fornot wearing a maskany reason they want.
You're conflating the two. Trying to compare apples and Buicks isn't interesting to me.
I honestly don't think this is too big a deal. The chances of being outside and getting COVID are pretty low. If stadiums require proof of vaccination or testing then that should provided, but not a big deal IMO if they want to open the floodgates at outdoor events.
Indoor facilities are a completely different matter. Vaccination should be a requirement to attend the SEC championship.
Manipulating a deadly virus in a lab, releasing it out on the population, then forcing everyone to get a "vaccine" created by the same globalist who released the virus. Subsequently relinquishing all of your god given rights which in return makes you their SLAVE. That is a satanic trash ass nazi agenda...got it?
Those two things are exactly the same thing.
So this study would suggest you are 29 times more likely to be hospitalized if you are unvaccinated vs vaccinated when dealing with the delta variant.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7034e5-H.pdf
Your post circles back to what I said earlier. A private business can throw me off their plane for just about whatever. The federal government (subject of the discussion) doesnt have free license to throw me off someone elses plane.
Now sure if I am trying to get out of Kabul then yeah the government can chuck me off a wheel well or something. But I doubt you are talking Biden Air.
A little hyperbole there Chief. We can't throw you off for 'any reason we want'.
Has anyone inquired as to how "vaccinated vs unvaccinated" is calculated in these reports of mild/outpatient cases? As I pointed out earlier, there is definitely nowhere to indicate that when we send positive test information to the state. It is my understanding that positives are assumed to be unvaccinated (and likely counted as such unless further info is available).
This is not a vaccine.So you don't agree with the results of Jacobson v. Massachusetts nor the Supreme Court decisions to uphold it (Including the currently seated SCOTUS) and the cases directly related to it?
On this day, the Supreme Court rules on vaccines and public health - National Constitution Center
Bound by corporate policy. You are not allowed to wear offensive clothes aboard. Corporate decision, not mine nor my FAs. And we are allowed to be offended as well, because we are... well.. human.It was a little hyperbole, sure. I've heard of people getting tossed for wearing clothes that a flight attendant deemed to revealing or distasteful.
Interfering with a flight crew is given a pretty wide latitude of discretion, surely you won't deny that.