Vaccine or not?

#11,378
#11,378
SpaceCoastVol said:
Father in law passed away today. Fully vaccinated. Had Chinese Flu.

Your turn.
Click to expand...
Sorry for you and your wife’s loss. You asked about what data point he represents and sadly the answer is one that will likely be swept under the rug. There are more stories like yours out there that aren’t being counted and aren’t being told except by those affected where they are dismissed as a one off. But it’s not. I know several people with stories like yours, many of them have multiple such stories.
 
#11,379
#11,379
Sandman 423 said:
was the "rent" that he responded to a random post that makes no sense without context?
Click to expand...
Nope.
The rent free is that he’s going to respond to almost every thing I post regardless of context.
Edit: the context was, I posted the flu vaccine thing to see how he would respond to it. He didn’t disappoint
 
#11,380
#11,380
You probably won't see this reported in mainstream news

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”


Healthy 16-year-old boy dies during online class after second Pfizer jab: VAERS database - LifeSite
 
Last edited:
#11,384
#11,384
VolinWayne said:
You probably won't see this reported in mainstream news

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”


Healthy 16-year-old boy dies during online class after second Pfizer jab: VAERS database - LifeSite
Click to expand...

What's important here is that we all assume that it was the vaccine before the autopsy report comes back. Is that the gist of the article from a fringe right, anti vax "news" website?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and Sea Ray
#11,388
#11,388
Volaholic320 said:
Lol, the only time Tank wants to wait for the science.
Click to expand...

I'd always want to wait on "the science", but this isn't even that - waiting on the results of an autopsy is common sense and step 1 when trying to ascertain an official cause of death.

After looking through that absolute cringe of a website, it doesn't surprise me that some of you fringe wackos would look to it for low brow confirmation bias.

But good job with the "tank" zing, did you come up with that yourself? Very impressive.
 
#11,391
#11,391
Septic said:
What's important here is that we all assume that it was the vaccine before the autopsy report comes back. Is that the gist of the article from a fringe right, anti vax "news" website?
Click to expand...


It's pretty obvious given the circumstances. There is almost zero risk of healthy kids dying from covid. Why vaccinate kids with a vaccine that's caused over 16,000 deaths (probably a lot more) when it's simply not a risk to kids. They have a higher chance of dying by suicide.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.
 
#11,394
#11,394
SpaceCoastVol said:
Is it relevant? I am asking to make a point. He was not overweight. Didn't have diabetes. He did have Parkinson's.

He was fully 'vaccinated'. He had China Flu. What data point does he represent?
Click to expand...

Sorry for your loss , mine also had Parkinson’s . It’s a long hard road to travel .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#11,395
#11,395
tnmarktx said:
Click to expand...



☝☝☝This all day. I was talking to a doctor at my church the other day and he was telling me that has been prescribing ivermectin and chloroquine to covid patients for months now and has not had one single patient be admitted into the hospital. He said it is flat out criminal the way hospitals and the news media are pushing the lie that this treatment doesn't work. It is a lie and and at this point anybody who pushes the narrative that Ivermectin
doesn't work is part of the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, Rasputin_Vol and tnmarktx
#11,398
#11,398
VolinWayne said:
☝☝☝This all day. I was talking to a doctor at my church the other day and he was telling me that has been prescribing ivermectin and chloroquine to covid patients for months now and has not had one single patient be admitted into the hospital. He said it is flat out criminal the way hospitals and the news media are pushing the lie that this treatment doesn't work. It is a lie and and at this point anybody who pushes the narrative that Ivermectin
doesn't work is part of the problem.
Click to expand...
Just like all the comments about ivermectin in this thread. The people in these posts are simply lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol and VolinWayne
#11,400
#11,400
VolinWayne said:
It's pretty obvious given the circumstances. There is almost zero risk of healthy kids dying from covid. Why vaccinate kids with a vaccine that's caused over 16,000 deaths (probably a lot more) when it's simply not a risk to kids. They have a higher chance of dying by suicide.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.
Click to expand...

Is it though?

giphy.gif



No one is arguing it couldn't happen and perhaps the kid was killed by myocarditis or some other ailment, my whole point is that it's irresponsible reporting (of you want to call it that) to presume it was that or that the vaccine caused it - before the autopsy. I get it though, you glom on to any sliver of negative press, even if it's presumptuous and unverified. If you wait for the autopsy and it's not myocarditis, then the opportunity to slam the vaccines is lost. It's a pretty transparent strategy...

Anything to keep the narrative alive. ANYTHING.

It really lends to your credibility. When you take a circumstance like this and add it to your suppositional rants in the "big lie" thread - you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel of wanting to be taken seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top