rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,298
- Likes
- 24,325
The article details it's methodology
So are the hospitalizations “of” or “with” Covid? If there is a single discriminator that needs to be called out, specifically, that is it. The interpretation is completely different depending on it. I didn’t see this anywhere in the article. I don’t care how many PhD’s re-post it, this will tell the story and keeping this qualifier out is dishonest at best, and intentional fear mongering at worst.
Furthermore, I found this little gem:
According to data published on Friday by the French directorate of research, studies, evaluation and statistics, an unvaccinated 70-year-old who tests positive for Omicron is still about twice as likely to end up in an intensive care unit as an unvaccinated 40-year-old with Delta. However, the risk is cut in half from 1.9 per cent to 0.9 per cent if they have received two vaccine doses. A booster dose takes their risk down three-fold again to just 0.3 per cent, one-third of the risk of the unvaccinated 40-year-old with Delta.
And this:
“The truth is that an 80-year-old that’s vaccinated and boosted and gets Covid most of the time has nothing more than a cold,” said Phillip Coule, professor of emergency medicine at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University. By contrast, he added, “a healthy 50-year-old who’s a little bit overweight, has problems with blood pressure or diabetes and is not vaccinated at all ends up in the ICU”.
So old and fat people are most at risk if they get the virus. How does this in anyway build the case for overall population vaccination? If anything these snippets are - very bluntly - building the case that young healthy people DON’T need it.
It’s past stupid and frustrating to have to go through all the crap out there one at a time to correctly interpret and de-bunk the surface message being reported.
Just stop posting it. The message simply doesn’t add up to the data.
Last edited: