Jxn Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,142
- Likes
- 14,768
Or you could pay attention to the context of the conversation and realize that I wasn’t complaining about the thread. I explained why I still click on it in a prior post.Or you can keep clicking on it and complaining about the thread.
What is your experience and expertise?
Lawyer. That explains a lot. Decades of legal practice gives you the same expertise and experience as a Walgreens cashier related to virus science.Or you could pay attention to the context of the conversation and realize that I wasn’t complaining about the thread. I explained why I still click on it in a prior post.
I have a law degree and a decade of experience in various areas of legal practice.
Bless your heart, you made an effort.Lawyer. That explains a lot. Decades of legal practice gives you the same expertise and experience as a Walgreens cashier related to virus science.
because of… how those people present in fields where I actually have some experience or expertise.
There you go. Let that lawyer a$$ hole out. You know as much about virology as the Walgreens cashier. So you can sit and spin on it.Bless your heart, you made an effort.
What I actually said was that I don’t find some people credible…
May not have been the clearest wording, but it obviously was not a claim about viral expertise. A fully English literate reader would understand that it actually was a concession that I don’t have expertise in that area and am relying on other indicators of credibility to weigh people who claim they do.
I wouldn’t come into Walgreens and tell you how to run your cash register and, if I did, and clearly didn’t know wtf I was talking about, you’d be justified in not listening to me telling you how to clean the toilets, either.
Likewise, if I were to continue insisting that you believed your experience working the register at Walgreens meant you knew about virology, even after you explained that you didn’t know anything about virology and never claimed to, you’d be justified in assuming that nothing I said was ever correct.There you go. Let that lawyer a$$ hole out. You know as much about virology as the Walgreens cashier. So you can sit and spin on it.
Like I said earlier. Feel free to not click on the thread. And if you are still curious as to why this subject is still relevant it’s because this non working shot is still being pushed by big pharma and the government.
All for a virus with a 99% survival rate.
Here is the thing. I actually have experience and expertise in this field. Thanks for playing. Go take a lap.Likewise, if I were to continue insisting that you believed your experience working the register at Walgreens meant you knew about virology, even after you explained that you didn’t know anything about virology and never claimed to, you’d be justified in assuming that nothing I said was ever correct.
Here is the thing. I actually have experience and expertise in this field. Thanks for playing. Go take a lap.
I’m basically saying you are an ignorant tool. And you have decades of experience and expertise in that field. And you keep clicking on a thread and complaining about the thread being relevant. So at this point you can keep complaining while having zero knowledge of the subject. Or choose not to click.One has to wonder how much expertise can be accumulated by a person who doesn’t understand the phrase “I don’t have expertise in that area.” That seems like an extremely low bar for giving you the benefit of the doubt. And you failed to pass it. Twice.
Under a low rate of transmission scenario, Pfizer actually demonstrated (see chart above) that the risk of myocarditis is greater than the risk of hospitalization with CV infection. Additionally, keep in mind that this was with the prior more Virulent strains. The current strain poses virtually no risk of hospitalization for children.
I’m basically saying you are an ignorant tool. And you have decades of experience and expertise in that field. And you keep clicking on a thread and complaining about the thread being relevant. So at this point you can keep complaining while having zero knowledge of the subject. Or choose not to click.
But let us not cloud the fact that the shot for the 99% survivable virus doesn’t work. And can cause a lot of damage.
I wasn’t complaining about the thread.
Could you do me a favor and just make up some comments filled with biting condescension about people who don’t understand phrases like:
Then read them aloud to yourself.
You could even just reuse my last several comments, substituting that phrase, if that’s easier.
Thanks.
This is what an ignorant lawyer looks like folks.Could you do me a favor and just make up some comments filled with biting condescension about people who don’t understand phrases like:
Then read them aloud to yourself.
You could even just reuse my last several comments, substituting that phrase, if that’s easier.
Thanks.
Well I wish you no harm and very much appreciate you making my point so succinctly.This is what an ignorant lawyer looks like folks.
99% survivable virus with a shot mandate. And you see these guys scurrying around.
Do me a favor and go to Macdonalds. Buy a small cup of coffee. Then pour it on your genitals.
My gut told me no to the vax for my kids, and my son has had it once, maybe twice with just a fever and no sequella.. my daughter has never had it .. and they went back to school as soon as they opened back up..my husband and I presented a murkier what to do path.. we had all the shots and got PNA (me), and cerebellar and parietal strokes (him).. it almost seemed like the vaccines primed our bodies to get really sick when we actually did get the virus, but that’s crazy, right?Under a low rate of transmission scenario, Pfizer actually demonstrated (see chart above) that the risk of myocarditis is greater than the risk of hospitalization with CV infection. Additionally, keep in mind that this was with the prior more Virulent strains. The current strain poses virtually no risk of hospitalization for children.
Every vaccine is protected from lawsuits. The US government underwrites almost all vaccine injuries in this country and pays them out of various funds. They’ve done that since the 1980’s.I heard on the Dan Bongino show that the most likely reason the CDC is going to add this “vaccine” to the list of recommended children’s vaccines is because the vaccines on that list are protected from lawsuits. Just another layer of protection for the manufacturers for the time being.
Crazy? No, not at all. Look up "antibody dependent enhancement." I'm not telling you that's the explanation, but it's a possibility.we had all the shots and got PNA (me), and cerebellar and parietal strokes (him).. it almost seemed like the vaccines primed our bodies to get really sick when we actually did get the virus, but that’s crazy, right?