No, it isn't an evil question but it is disingenuous to ask it in this case. The same way a head on collision causing death doesn't qualify to ask that question. The issue for Damar's situation, is what will the NFL mandate now about chest protection? Lacrosse at the High School and College level mandate chest plates whereas they used to only require upper shoulder protection.
I will provide resources.They probably won't from massive blunt force trauma but with something like a lacrosse ball they do. The Lax protection is from a 100+ mph shot vs. a 200 lb. defense man putting you on your ass.
Surprisingly, commercially available chest wall protectors have not been shown to effectively prevent commotio cordis, both in the clinical arena and in laboratory animal studies [3,22,27,28]. Many of the commotio cordis victims reported to the National Commotio Cordis Registry were wearing protective equipment at the time of their event [3].
In ALL of football, this is the first instance? Gonna need a link for that.The issue is that we can look at the data and see that head on collision car accidents have a very high fatality rate. Making a routine tackle of a wide receiver where his shoulder pad hits your chest does not have a very high fatality rate. In fact, prior to last night, in the NFL, it was zero. Contrast that with 66 young professional athletes dying suddenly from heart issues in one single year. You're asking us to ignore a very rare occurrence in favor of an even more rare occurrence because of some mythical "bad form" argument.
We can explain away many of the examples. But the number of professional athletes who have died from heart problems recently is absolutely staggering. You can't just wave your hands and dismiss 66 dead professional athletes. Here's a database of athletes who all have had some form of sudden heart issues. You can filter by outcome and level of athlete. If you filter "pro" with an outcome of "death" there are 66 in one single year. That's outrageous and even more outrageous that you would chastise someone for pointing it out.
Airtable | Everyone's app platform
It has been for years and years. There are likely tens of thousands of examples from me in this very forum. I've said the same about the vax but now I'm wrong because I don't look to it first in every death of a young person?Your concern and disdain should be directed at the institutions and govts that made us have to have these discussions in the first place... not at the people questioning why young people are passing out and dying. Those guys made the vaccine a divisive and toxic subject. Had it not been for their antics, we wouldn't be here right now.
Sixteen swine received 144 impacts. The flat object did not cause VF (P = .01 compared with the two spherical objects), nonsustained VF, ST elevation, or bundle branch block. The smaller diameter sphere caused VF in nine of 48 impacts (19%), and the larger diameter sphere caused VF in five of 48 impacts (10%; P = .25). The smaller diameter sphere was associated with a greater increase in left ventricular pressure (P<.0001 and P = .001 compared with larger sphere only) and a higher likelihood of ST segment elevations (P<.001 and P = .08 compared with larger sphere only) and bundle branch block (Fisher's exact P = .008, and Fisher's exact P = .18 compared with larger sphere only).
In ALL of football, this is the first instance? Gonna need a link for that.
The vax should have had very limited use. The fact it's still being pushed for everyone even with the mounds of data is one of our biggest failures in this pandemic. Its use should be limited and targeted
The "I told you so" is in the data
That's a FIFA study, but it isn't a study of professional athletes. Their denominator was 260 million people of all ages who play organized soccer.
Sorry I thought he was quoting vax death guy instead of kd.
However, trying to tie the vax into what happened seems a huge stretch and in worse form than skip Bayless