Pacer92
Youneverknow
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,821
- Likes
- 18,540
Not if the other side is just stating clear falsehoods that never are verified. That’s just propaganda. In this case I couldn’t find a single mention of it. But I did find several referencing the Russian missile attack yesterday where Pootin took credit for killing three Ukraine generals and several officers WHILE the attack was occurring before any BDA could occur. He’s a regular Nostradumbass!Accept? Don’t you think it interesting to hear both sides…or just one?
Actually no I don’t consider her a trusty worthy source either since she was literally a recent admin press secretary. So big time fail there champ!
Oh no they aren’t champ! Rejected! Even the BBC is a publicly funded independent national broadcaster. The oldest in existence in fact. It’s laughable to mention RT or TASS in the same breath with those I listed. Especially the BBC.My point exactly…
Where do we find the truth? Those outlets you named are just as much western mouthpieces as RT is a mouthpiece for the RF…probably more so.
Not if the other side is just stating clear falsehoods that never are verified. That’s just propaganda. In this case I couldn’t find a single mention of it. But I did find several referencing the Russian missile attack yesterday where Pootin took credit for killing three Ukraine generals and several officers WHILE the attack was occurring before any BDA could occur. He’s a regular Nostradumbass!
I believe you've been making that claim for about three months now.Russia is about to wrap up The Donbas. They have about 2500 Ukrainians encircled at Lysychansk and will like be encircling/engaging a set of troops in Kramatorsk. Once these groups are dealt with, those would be the majority of the Ukrainians elite forces.
Interesting as in reading pure fiction, sure. Actually learning much of anything. Not really. You dont ever offer any qualifiers, "this is a russian source so they are probably exaggerating their numbers, but here is some more info".Accept? Don’t you think it interesting to hear both sides…or just one?
when has Japan invaded a country and committed mass rape against women, men, and children, since WW2?If that is supposed to be a clever shot at me, it misses the mark a bit. I've never campaigned for, muchless celebrated Juneteenth in my life, nor do I know of many/any blacks before last year that celebrated, and I don't remember any campaign that requested it to be a holiday.
Also, my comment was in direct response to @MG1968 and his dismissive comment about the Rape of Nanking over 70 years ago and not being outraged at Japanese today, yet oddly we still hold Russia out as serial racists because of the Berlin rapes. I'm not condoning or defending either situation, I'm merely pointing out the double standard.
Interesting as in reading pure fiction, sure. Actually learning much of anything. Not really. You dont ever offer any qualifiers, "this is a russian source so they are probably exaggerating their numbers, but here is some more info".
Reading it is not the problem. Buying into is. You dont accept one source and offer up another and then want to pretend like your source was randomly picked out of a hat and is a better alternative.
You could easily go to actual third parties. Chinese state media is interesting, because they throw out the good and the bad. Indian and african sources as well. Heck even some of the old Soviet bloc offer unique views depending on how much pressure putin puts on them. You can actively gauge it by reading them for a couple weeks.
But none of you offer any real balance. I dont care that they quote bull ***t if you quote horse ***t. Offer some actual balanced media or stories and then you can rightly complain about the propaganda they are buying.