IluvdoubleD's
Sir Loves
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Messages
- 18,454
- Likes
- 8,626
Dude looks real enough to me. NRA Releases Full Trove of Data Critical to Russia's National Security - Kyiv Post - Ukraine's Global Voice
Link to the language of this all or nothing deal?What would have been the problem with Yanukovich in 2013 being able to have the flexibility to have economic dealings with both the EU and Russia? That was the origins of the problem. Ukraine has economic ties to Russia, along with the obvious ethnic and historical ties. But the Europeans/US wanted Yanukovich to sign a deal where Ukraine was exclusively to deal with Europe and end dealings with Russia.
Why did the West force an all or nothing deal?
Yeah, so no actual language of this rejection of Russia. More fear mongering from Russia, not supported by facts.Damn man, the very first Google search I make...
Ukraine and European Union Agreement Spurns Russia | Guardian Liberty Voice (guardianlv.com)
Ukraine and the European Union (EU) formalized a trade agreement on June 27 that effectively spurns Russia and provides economic and national security for the fledgling, independent nation. Over the past couple years; inconsistency has characterized the relationship between the EU and the eastern European neighbor that separates it from Russia. In 2012, the EU prepared a similar agreement with conditions that Ukraine make some internal changes to its legal and electoral systems that would more closely align with the European Union. Specifically, the EU asked Ukraine to free two opposition leaders. Despite pressure from his constituents, Viktor Yanukovych did not sign the trade agreement with between his country and the European Union. The two opposition leaders were not freed, and Yanukovych’s decision sparked pro-West demonstrations throughout Ukraine.
During the few days surrounding Kiev’s 2013 change of heart under Yanukovych, the Oman Observer reported that Ukraine’s cold feet came from pressure from Moscow who continually reminded Ukraine of potential economic repercussions from turning its back on Russia. Addressing the nation in a televised interview, then president Yanukovych told Ukraine that he was waiting for the EU to sweeten the terms of their proposed arrangement to account for the damages that would be caused by cutting economic ties with Russia. The European Union sent the message to Kiev that if Ukraine wanted the agreement then the EU was ready to talk about next steps. Yanukovych backed out. Russia did not favor losing influence over its former vassal. Tensions between the Kremlin and EU rose.
LMAO Moe way to shoot you self in the footDamn man, the very first Google search I make...
Ukraine and European Union Agreement Spurns Russia | Guardian Liberty Voice (guardianlv.com)
Ukraine and the European Union (EU) formalized a trade agreement on June 27 that effectively spurns Russia and provides economic and national security for the fledgling, independent nation. Over the past couple years; inconsistency has characterized the relationship between the EU and the eastern European neighbor that separates it from Russia. In 2012, the EU prepared a similar agreement with conditions that Ukraine make some internal changes to its legal and electoral systems that would more closely align with the European Union. Specifically, the EU asked Ukraine to free two opposition leaders. Despite pressure from his constituents, Viktor Yanukovych did not sign the trade agreement with between his country and the European Union. The two opposition leaders were not freed, and Yanukovych’s decision sparked pro-West demonstrations throughout Ukraine.
During the few days surrounding Kiev’s 2013 change of heart under Yanukovych, the Oman Observer reported that Ukraine’s cold feet came from pressure from Moscow who continually reminded Ukraine of potential economic repercussions from turning its back on Russia. Addressing the nation in a televised interview, then president Yanukovych told Ukraine that he was waiting for the EU to sweeten the terms of their proposed arrangement to account for the damages that would be caused by cutting economic ties with Russia. The European Union sent the message to Kiev that if Ukraine wanted the agreement then the EU was ready to talk about next steps. Yanukovych backed out. Russia did not favor losing influence over its former vassal. Tensions between the Kremlin and EU rose.
Damn man, the very first Google search I make...
Ukraine and European Union Agreement Spurns Russia | Guardian Liberty Voice (guardianlv.com)
Ukraine and the European Union (EU) formalized a trade agreement on June 27 that effectively spurns Russia and provides economic and national security for the fledgling, independent nation. Over the past couple years; inconsistency has characterized the relationship between the EU and the eastern European neighbor that separates it from Russia. In 2012, the EU prepared a similar agreement with conditions that Ukraine make some internal changes to its legal and electoral systems that would more closely align with the European Union. Specifically, the EU asked Ukraine to free two opposition leaders. Despite pressure from his constituents, Viktor Yanukovych did not sign the trade agreement with between his country and the European Union. The two opposition leaders were not freed, and Yanukovych’s decision sparked pro-West demonstrations throughout Ukraine.
During the few days surrounding Kiev’s 2013 change of heart under Yanukovych, the Oman Observer reported that Ukraine’s cold feet came from pressure from Moscow who continually reminded Ukraine of potential economic repercussions from turning its back on Russia. Addressing the nation in a televised interview, then president Yanukovych told Ukraine that he was waiting for the EU to sweeten the terms of their proposed arrangement to account for the damages that would be caused by cutting economic ties with Russia. The European Union sent the message to Kiev that if Ukraine wanted the agreement then the EU was ready to talk about next steps. Yanukovych backed out. Russia did not favor losing influence over its former vassal. Tensions between the Kremlin and EU rose.
And it cant even say that they were actual Ulrainian activists.One more thing :
"The government of Yanukovych fell in the midst of civil unrest. Pro-Russian activists fled to the east and asked Russia to annex part of Ukraine. Yanukovych fled to Russia."
According to the article you provided, the separatist movement in the east started when pro-Russian activists from other parts of Ukraine moved there and contacted Russia.
Interestingly, this is one of the metrics the UN uses when weighing the legality of a secession movement. Not that the UN can be fair in regards to Ukraine/Russia, but if they were, this would be Ukraine shooting itself in d1ck yet again.