volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 7,771
- Likes
- 7,995
Another thing to add, compare Putin to Zelensky during this conflict. Who would be more likely to use a dirty bomb? Putin has been calm, restrained, and consistent throughout, whereas Zelensky has been quite the opposite.
Russia has been fear mongering about a dirty bomb by Ukraine. For weeks prior they have been openly discussing using a nuke themselves.
I suspect they have been told this would be met with extreme action.
So float the dirty bomb. Now they would have justification for escalating to using nuclear weapons. Only a freaking moron would fall for it. But I believe we know who on here would.
Proof?Putin has lied throughout. His armies in Ukraine have committed many documented atrocities, including torture and mass murders of civilians. He regularly targets civilians with aerial munitions, for the purpose of terrorizing the population. Zelensky has limited his aerial attacks to military targets, with a publicly expressed policy of avoiding civilian casualties. The only exceptions I've seen reported are individual Ukrainians who served as political stooges for the Russian occupying army. The suggestion that Zelensky would deploy a dirty bomb on his own people is false nonsense. You are parroting Russian propaganda, which is a pack of lies. Again, the question is why?
Hang on Larry I’ve seen you stooges drop RT and other Russia state media links claiming Russia was already fighting NATO directly. Even today there was reference to “western boots on the ground” in the conflict. FFS at least try to stay consistent with your billHow in the hell does that benefit Russia? The last thing Russia wants is the West to get involved...which is exactly what would happen in your insane not well thought out scenario.
Plenty of visual evidence out there of course unless you believe Ukraine bound, raped, tortured, then murdered their own citizens (men, women, children) as Russians retreated to discredit them.Proof?
They are not more capitalist than us at all. They are a complete top down controlled economy. They arent the typical 100% state owned, but they are dictated by the government.These guys are stuck in 1989. Hell, you can make an argument that China isn't a pure communist country and implements more capitalist in its economy than the US or any other Western nation right now. Not saying China is perfect, but the one thing China does well is what the US was great at 40 years ago.
TBH, I don't really care, nor have I followed what's going on over there very closely. I was just genuinely curious.Plenty of visual evidence out there of course unless you believe Ukraine bound, raped, tortured, then murdered their own citizens (men, women, children) as Russians retreated to discredit them.
Here is a snippet of a small UN investigation:
Update by the Chair of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, at the 51st session of the Human Rights Council
Yeah, how does that square with the russians talking about pulling out of kherson?They don't to detonate a nuke to escalate. Do you guys even think before you post? The US/NATO need Russia to use a nuke to get their population behind a western escalation that will likely require boots on the ground as Western boots on the ground is the only thing standing between Russia and victory.