War in Ukraine

[Rasputin_Vol]

Speaking of M1s they may be getting into Ukraine sooner than later. There is some talk that Biden may transfer from current stocks instead of new builds.

EXCLUSIVE: Ukraine’s M1 Abrams tanks could come from US stockpiles, official says - Breaking Defense

Logistically how would that be possible? Realistically, how would that be possible without Russia simply bombing them?

 

[hog88]

You have no damn idea. I know you think you do but you don’t. And you’re a boat owner and understand what a PITA boat ownership really is too

Yes but boats don't take all your ish if they catch you in another boat.

 

[NorthDallas40]

And NATO can do the same.

NATO has no forces involved in this conflict Moe. We know you claim they do but anyone with a functioning brain sees they don’t. And if there comes a day NATO is actively involved the bald dwarf is ended.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Yes but boats don't take all your ish if they catch you in another boat.

Oh no I was agreeing with you. You think you have an idea what a handful she is. You can only really understand by living the Latina overlord life

 

[hog88]

Oh no I was agreeing with you. You think you have an idea what a handful she is. You can only really understand by living the Latina overlord life

I don't think I ever want to find out. I dated a redhead once and that was crazy enough for me.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Mild winter. Don't worry. Time is still on Russia's side.

So winter is STILL coming?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

[Burhead]

Logistically how would that be possible? Realistically, how would that be possible without Russia simply bombing them?

We’ve been pretty successful in transferring arms from Poland into Ukraine for a year now…

 

[OrangeTsar]

Oh my…..:
THIS will help things along
Ukraine vows to end war with Russia by parking tanks in Moscow's Red Square

 

[NorthDallas40]

You guys really do love Emperor Cokeinsky.

I absolutely knew that gif would trigger your small smooth brain

 

[Burhead]

And NATO can do the same.

No NATO forces in Ukraine unless you mean from NATO countries that border Russia but they were requested by the host nations.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Friends, we are sleepwalking in to a global blood bath.

One of the best recent books on how WWI began based on the great powers blundering into a world conflict from what was basically a regional conflict is actually called “the sleepwalkers”

 

[BeardedVol]

Oh my…..:
THIS will help things along
Ukraine vows to end war with Russia by parking tanks in Moscow's Red Square

The easiest way to keep that from occuring would be to remove Russian troops from Ukraine, and reinforce positions around Moscow.

 

[OrangeTsar]

If Russia prevails in Ukraine they won’t stop until all non NATO bordering (or newly bordering) countries are assimilated in sane made up historical ethnic tie stupid narrative.

I cannot believe they would be stupid enough to actually attack a NATO member and invoke article 5 that would be their end. If the bald dwarf sees himself going out and tries to make that play hopefully he will be neutralized from within.

But I think those are the only two end options. Either Russia prevails or the Russian government collapses.

Option 3, Putin sees he is losing and decides to deploy tactical nukes. Wither then friends?

 

[Burhead]

One takes higher priority over the other. World hegemony is not even part of our founding documents.

At one time neutrality and isolationism could work but no more.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Option 3, Putin sees he is losing and decides to deploy tactical nukes. Wither then friends?

You know this tired appeal to appeasement is still not getting traction. If he decides to initiate nuclear war and his own people don’t take him out then we get nuclear war. And the appeasement narrative you’re pushing is yet more reason why this tool has to go.

And option 3 still ends with the collapse of the Russian government

 

[OrangeTsar]

The easiest way to keep that from occuring would be to remove Russian troops from Ukraine, and reinforce positions around Moscow.

The point I wished to make is not even related to how practical the Ukraine wish is or isn’t. It is that that sort of intransigence (and similar stubbornness on the Russian side) makes any near term resolution highly unlikely. Which means the terrible bloodshed continues and we continue whistling around in the graveyard of open graves that is the danger of WWIII

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[OrangeTsar]

You know this tired appeal to appeasement is still not getting traction. If he decides to initiate nuclear war and his own people don’t take him out then we get nuclear war. And the appeasement narrative you’re pushing is yet more reason why this tool has to go.

And option 3 still ends with the collapse of the Russian government

It is not appeasement. It is realpolitik. Small regional wars involving great powers eventually spiral into something much worse of you don’t end them. If there is a small grass fire burning next to your barn full of hay, a wise farmer tries to put it out quickly

 

[NorthDallas40]

It is not appeasement. It is realpolitik. Small regional wars involving great powers eventually spiral into something much worse of you don’t end them. If there is a small grass fire burning next to your barn full of hay, a wise farmer tries to put it out quickly

It is appeasement. And I don’t care how much you protest that it isn’t.

 

[NorthDallas40]

The point I wished to make is not even related to how practical the Ukraine wish is or isn’t. It is that that sort of intransigence (and similar stubbornness on the Russian side) makes any near term resolution highly unlikely. Which means the terrible bloodshed continues and we continue whistling around in the graveyard of open graves that is the danger of WWIII
View attachment 537466

Sounds like more appeasement talking to me.

 

[BeardedVol]

The point I wished to make is not even related to how practical the Ukraine wish is or isn’t. It is that that sort of intransigence (and similar stubbornness on the Russian side) makes any near term resolution highly unlikely. Which means the terrible bloodshed continues and we continue whistling around in the graveyard of open graves that is the danger of WWIII
View attachment 537466

How many other countries on this planet do you think would just surrender to an invader and give up 20% of their territory for a temporary peace, rather than attempt to resist?

 

[BeardedVol]

View attachment 537468

Who is Mindy Robinson, and why should anyone care about her opinions?

 

[Burhead]

It is not appeasement. It is realpolitik. Small regional wars involving great powers eventually spiral into something much worse of you don’t end them. If there is a small grass fire burning next to your barn full of hay, a wise farmer tries to put it out quickly

And giving concessions to avoid conflict makes the next war even bigger. The world did nothing when Germany went into the Rhineland, didn't lift a finger at Anschluss, and negotiated away Czechoslovakia's sovereignty and it still didn't avert a war. Same thing happened in Georgia in 2008 and Crimea in 2014 and now we're left in a larger war thanks to inaction then.

 

[DonjoVol]

I absolutely knew that gif would trigger your small smooth brain

Lol. Only person that got triggered was you when someone shared that video of your emperor obviously high on cocaine. You've been embarrassing yourself more since then.

 

[DonjoVol]

Who is Mindy Robinson, and why should anyone care about her opinions?

She doesn't parrot your religious talking points from your mainstream media Maddow. So you wouldn't like her.