War in Ukraine

More childish behavior and insults. I'm quite surprised the mods haven't removed that garbage post.
Quit trying to be a victim. It's a very common tool used to show the false dichotomy you presented with a yes/no only question. False dilemma - Wikipedia

Like I said. If it bothers you, ask your questions more honestly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
What proof do you have of that?
They unleashed a world wide pandemic to quell the massive internal unrest they were having in 2019. Also allowed them to "intern" a bunch more minorities and keep them indefinitely.

It wasnt civil war bad, but the responses to the peaceful protests were turning violent, and requiring extreme lock downs to try and control. The same type of lock downs they implemented for Covid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
1.There are people here, many of whom vote Democrat, that are hoping for an authoritarian society here. Let's hope it doesn't get to that point.

2. The United States has plenty of debt and we should be worrying about our own before we go off criticizing another country for theirs.

3. Their population is projected to decline by 2050. However it will still be 3 to 4 times the size of the U.S. at that time.

They have made strides economically, in space exploration and their military is one of the best in the world. They will be fine going forward. Plus if Russia, China and India all 3 have an economic alliance it will only make all 3 nations stronger going forward.

Their population is aging rapidly. They will be losing too many producers in the future. They are also not innovative. If you have a so-called "break through" in China it is because they stole the technology. With the U.S. and other countries decoupling over the next two decades they will no longer advance because they cannot think original thoughts for themselves. They are taught to memorize, not come up with new ideas. That's not how they operate. Their military can't hold a candle to ours. They are, and always will be, 10 to 20 years behind in technology to the U.S. in military terms. Their GDP is also a joke.
 
Buh Bye Russian BTGs...

ISW:

"A reportedly captured Russian military manual suggests that Russian forces are implementing new assault tactics to compensate for current combat power limitations in response to continued offensive failures. A Ukrainian reserve officer posted a picture on February 26 reportedly of a captured Russian manual that details the tactics of a newly minted "assault detachment," which is a battalion-sized element that has been optimized for frontal assaults on fortified areas.[11] The assault detachment formation reportedly fields six T-72 main battle tanks, 12 infantry fighting vehicles, and a collection of man-portable thermobaric rocket launchers, anti-tank guided missile systems, towed artillery, and self-propelled mortars.[12] The assault detachment appears to be comprised of three assault companies and a tank section.[13] Each assault company has a command element, two assault "platoons" (at far below normal platoon strength), a UAV team, an armored fighting vehicle (AFV) group, a fire support platoon and an artillery support platoon, a reserve section, and a medevac section. Each company fields one tank and four BMP/BMD-2 infantry fighting vehicles, with anti-tank launchers, heavy machine guns, and mortars. The Ukrainian reserve officer remarked that assault "platoons" of 12 to 15 people, divided into tactical groups of three people, are the formation’s primary maneuver elements.[14] The assault detachment reportedly conducts assaults within less than a minute of the time when artillery fire begins on open fortified positions, with the platoon commander controlling mortar fire.

The manual suggests that Russian forces are trying to adapt maneuver forces into smaller and more agile military formations than were employed earlier in the war. The Ukrainian reserve officer noted that this new tactical formation suggests that Russian forces have replaced the defunct battalion tactical group (BTG) with these smaller and more agile maneuver formations. The manual suggests that Russian forces are using T-72 tanks for direct fire support from the rear rather than as integral parts of a combined arms team. The increased reliance on dismounted infantry and the relegation of tanks to fire support from the rear indicates that Russian military leadership is prioritizing protecting main battle tanks over protecting infantry, which is reflective of recent reports of massive equipment losses that Russian armor units sustained over the first year of the war.[15] The manual indicates that the Russian military is resorting to employing a form of simplified combined arms warfare that has likely been pared down to compensate for the overall degradation of Russian manpower and equipment capacity and which is easier for inexperienced and untrained mobilized personnel slotted into such detachments to employ.

The tactics of the assault detachment additionally suggest that the Russian military may be attempting to institutionalize practices used to marginal tactical effect by the Wagner Group in Bakhmut. The Ukrainian reserve officer suggested that this new formation is likely partially influenced by Wagner Group operations around Bakhmut.[16] ISW has previously reported on the fact that Wagner has largely relied on squad-sized frontal assaults, which have decreased the reliance on massed fires as Russian artillery and equipment stocks have dwindled.[17] The Wagner Group’s highly attritional offensive on Bakhmut has failed to gain operationally significant ground, so the institutionalization of elements of Wagner’s tactics will likely further normalize attritional frontal assaults. Such tactics are likely to waste Russian combat power and not effectively counter conventional Ukrainian battalions and brigades. Assault detachments may be able to make tactical gains at cost due to their simplicity but will likely culminate rapidly due to their small size and attritional tactics. Russian forces are unlikely to make operationally significant breakthroughs rapidly with this formation."
 
Buh Bye Russian BTGs...

ISW:

"A reportedly captured Russian military manual suggests that Russian forces are implementing new assault tactics to compensate for current combat power limitations in response to continued offensive failures. A Ukrainian reserve officer posted a picture on February 26 reportedly of a captured Russian manual that details the tactics of a newly minted "assault detachment," which is a battalion-sized element that has been optimized for frontal assaults on fortified areas.[11] The assault detachment formation reportedly fields six T-72 main battle tanks, 12 infantry fighting vehicles, and a collection of man-portable thermobaric rocket launchers, anti-tank guided missile systems, towed artillery, and self-propelled mortars.[12] The assault detachment appears to be comprised of three assault companies and a tank section.[13] Each assault company has a command element, two assault "platoons" (at far below normal platoon strength), a UAV team, an armored fighting vehicle (AFV) group, a fire support platoon and an artillery support platoon, a reserve section, and a medevac section. Each company fields one tank and four BMP/BMD-2 infantry fighting vehicles, with anti-tank launchers, heavy machine guns, and mortars. The Ukrainian reserve officer remarked that assault "platoons" of 12 to 15 people, divided into tactical groups of three people, are the formation’s primary maneuver elements.[14] The assault detachment reportedly conducts assaults within less than a minute of the time when artillery fire begins on open fortified positions, with the platoon commander controlling mortar fire.

The manual suggests that Russian forces are trying to adapt maneuver forces into smaller and more agile military formations than were employed earlier in the war. The Ukrainian reserve officer noted that this new tactical formation suggests that Russian forces have replaced the defunct battalion tactical group (BTG) with these smaller and more agile maneuver formations. The manual suggests that Russian forces are using T-72 tanks for direct fire support from the rear rather than as integral parts of a combined arms team. The increased reliance on dismounted infantry and the relegation of tanks to fire support from the rear indicates that Russian military leadership is prioritizing protecting main battle tanks over protecting infantry, which is reflective of recent reports of massive equipment losses that Russian armor units sustained over the first year of the war.[15] The manual indicates that the Russian military is resorting to employing a form of simplified combined arms warfare that has likely been pared down to compensate for the overall degradation of Russian manpower and equipment capacity and which is easier for inexperienced and untrained mobilized personnel slotted into such detachments to employ.

The tactics of the assault detachment additionally suggest that the Russian military may be attempting to institutionalize practices used to marginal tactical effect by the Wagner Group in Bakhmut. The Ukrainian reserve officer suggested that this new formation is likely partially influenced by Wagner Group operations around Bakhmut.[16] ISW has previously reported on the fact that Wagner has largely relied on squad-sized frontal assaults, which have decreased the reliance on massed fires as Russian artillery and equipment stocks have dwindled.[17] The Wagner Group’s highly attritional offensive on Bakhmut has failed to gain operationally significant ground, so the institutionalization of elements of Wagner’s tactics will likely further normalize attritional frontal assaults. Such tactics are likely to waste Russian combat power and not effectively counter conventional Ukrainian battalions and brigades. Assault detachments may be able to make tactical gains at cost due to their simplicity but will likely culminate rapidly due to their small size and attritional tactics. Russian forces are unlikely to make operationally significant breakthroughs rapidly with this formation."
It could be an elaborate ruse. Wouldnt be the first time an enemy has just so happened to get their hands on a new guidebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
he played this game last year, he knows.
Has knowing stopped him before? I keep hoping one of them will see the problems with the logic they use to make their arguments. But it hasnt happened yet.

And before anyone plays the victim card again, that's not to say you are necessarily wrong or right, just that your stated logic isnt adding any validity to your stance.
 
China's sun is setting some. You will see more and more pull back from globalization. It will be more hemisphere specific. South America and Mexico will be producing more and more of our stuff. China will also be so bad upside down with their old one child policy having took them out at the knees. They shot themselves in both kneecaps decades ago.

You must not be keeping track of the belt and roadway projects. China is always a lowest bidder. They are becoming more of a threat regionally. I will try to find a recent piece on the topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Quit trying to be a victim. It's a very common tool used to show the false dichotomy you presented with a yes/no only question. False dilemma - Wikipedia

Like I said. If it bothers you, ask your questions more honestly.
Do you still beat your wife is actually the classical example of a loaded question. He does those all the time too he just isn’t smart enough to manipulate the desired result as they’re usually immediately following one of his many non sequiturs 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
I dont understand how you can watch that stuff.

It would be different if there were some Russian oligarchs on the front line playing Minesweeper with their face. But these are just poor schmucks for the most part, fed into the meat grinder to serve Putin's ego.

They have the ability to refuse to go.
 
Buh Bye Russian BTGs...

ISW:

"A reportedly captured Russian military manual suggests that Russian forces are implementing new assault tactics to compensate for current combat power limitations in response to continued offensive failures. A Ukrainian reserve officer posted a picture on February 26 reportedly of a captured Russian manual that details the tactics of a newly minted "assault detachment," which is a battalion-sized element that has been optimized for frontal assaults on fortified areas.[11] The assault detachment formation reportedly fields six T-72 main battle tanks, 12 infantry fighting vehicles, and a collection of man-portable thermobaric rocket launchers, anti-tank guided missile systems, towed artillery, and self-propelled mortars.[12] The assault detachment appears to be comprised of three assault companies and a tank section.[13] Each assault company has a command element, two assault "platoons" (at far below normal platoon strength), a UAV team, an armored fighting vehicle (AFV) group, a fire support platoon and an artillery support platoon, a reserve section, and a medevac section. Each company fields one tank and four BMP/BMD-2 infantry fighting vehicles, with anti-tank launchers, heavy machine guns, and mortars. The Ukrainian reserve officer remarked that assault "platoons" of 12 to 15 people, divided into tactical groups of three people, are the formation’s primary maneuver elements.[14] The assault detachment reportedly conducts assaults within less than a minute of the time when artillery fire begins on open fortified positions, with the platoon commander controlling mortar fire.

The manual suggests that Russian forces are trying to adapt maneuver forces into smaller and more agile military formations than were employed earlier in the war. The Ukrainian reserve officer noted that this new tactical formation suggests that Russian forces have replaced the defunct battalion tactical group (BTG) with these smaller and more agile maneuver formations. The manual suggests that Russian forces are using T-72 tanks for direct fire support from the rear rather than as integral parts of a combined arms team. The increased reliance on dismounted infantry and the relegation of tanks to fire support from the rear indicates that Russian military leadership is prioritizing protecting main battle tanks over protecting infantry, which is reflective of recent reports of massive equipment losses that Russian armor units sustained over the first year of the war.[15] The manual indicates that the Russian military is resorting to employing a form of simplified combined arms warfare that has likely been pared down to compensate for the overall degradation of Russian manpower and equipment capacity and which is easier for inexperienced and untrained mobilized personnel slotted into such detachments to employ.

The tactics of the assault detachment additionally suggest that the Russian military may be attempting to institutionalize practices used to marginal tactical effect by the Wagner Group in Bakhmut. The Ukrainian reserve officer suggested that this new formation is likely partially influenced by Wagner Group operations around Bakhmut.[16] ISW has previously reported on the fact that Wagner has largely relied on squad-sized frontal assaults, which have decreased the reliance on massed fires as Russian artillery and equipment stocks have dwindled.[17] The Wagner Group’s highly attritional offensive on Bakhmut has failed to gain operationally significant ground, so the institutionalization of elements of Wagner’s tactics will likely further normalize attritional frontal assaults. Such tactics are likely to waste Russian combat power and not effectively counter conventional Ukrainian battalions and brigades. Assault detachments may be able to make tactical gains at cost due to their simplicity but will likely culminate rapidly due to their small size and attritional tactics. Russian forces are unlikely to make operationally significant breakthroughs rapidly with this formation."

BTGs never made much sense except for limited interventions and hybrid war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh
he played this game last year, he knows.
What game?

It's a fact. You and your crowd always start with the insults and name calling. The mods made it clear recently they don't like it so I suggest you learn to disagree like an actual adult from here on out. And please stop tagging me. Thanks
 
Quit trying to be a victim. It's a very common tool used to show the false dichotomy you presented with a yes/no only question. False dilemma - Wikipedia

Like I said. If it bothers you, ask your questions more honestly.
Pointing out your childish behavior in that post isn't me playing a victim. That's simply me pointing out that your a grown man acting like a child at the time.

Now I suggest from here on out you and a select handful of others learn to disagree like actual adults.

It was a simple yes or no question that applied to the current conversation we were having. All it required was a simple yes or no question. Plus I was not even the one that brought the topic back up. It was one of your pals.
 
You must not be keeping track of the belt and roadway projects. China is always a lowest bidder. They are becoming more of a threat regionally. I will try to find a recent piece on the topic.
China is going to have more international fires than even we had in not too long. Already seeing it a bit in Sri Lanka, where pro Chinese officials are getting some major push back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top