KB5252
Repeat Forward Progress Victim
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 36,352
- Likes
- 34,082
The current U.S. assessment is that Russia would need about 10 days to complete preparations for an invasion, should Putin decide to act. That has officials looking at a window from mid-January to the end of February as a potential crunch time.
According to a Ukrainian military map compiled around the New Year and seen by Bloomberg News, Russia now has 52 battalion tactical groups in close proximity to Ukraine. Russia has also developed capabilities to deploy more units in a short period of time, from one to two weeks, the Ukrainian assessment shows.
On Friday, the US and NATO rejected a Russian call for the military alliance to halt its eastward expansion. Amid tensions around Ukraine, Russia submitted a series of security proposals to the US, and chief among the Russian requests is a guarantee that Ukraine won’t join NATO.
"NATO never promised not to admit new members; it could not and would not," Secretary of State Antony Blinken said after a virtual meeting of NATO’s foreign ministers.
The leaders of this country are nothing but stone cold liars and deceivers.
US Rejects Russia's Call To Halt NATO Expansion, Days Before Talks | ZeroHedge
It never was about NATO adding new members, Blinken. It was about NATO moving eastward and on Russia's border. This is some dishonest and deceptive bulls^^t.
Talks are going nowhere. Russia has said they will resort to other means to force the issue. We have seen indications that Putin has started moving attack helicopters to the border and now BTGs from the Eastern Military District are now railing to the west and Iskanders have seen on the move. Someone said this all feels like 2003 Iraq where we went through the motions of the politics but he decision has been made.
I think Putin has made the decision to invade and just going through the motions to be able to say, "Hey look I tried diplomacy and we couldn't get it done" much like we did with the invasion of Iraq.
Lets ask ourselves..why should we even be involved other than trying to prevent a humanitarian crisis? Is it oil and pipelines or other natural resources? It certainly cannot be some righteous "democracy" of the people while our own Feds are taking us into a totalitarian state.
I used to be an isolationist growing up. I think the time for that policy has come and gone. We're far to interconnected nowadays to have a totally hands off foreign policy. The days of the vast oceans giving us protection has come and gone. Now I don't believe we should be sending military off to every conflict everywhere but the US can't become like the Swiss or the world would really go up in flames.
The Russians are trying to negotiate with a dishonest and unbudging entity across the table from them in the United States. We throw out terms like "non-starter" and gaslight about not agreeing 30 years ago to push NATO on to Russia's borders.I think Putin has made the decision to invade and just going through the motions to be able to say, "Hey look I tried diplomacy and we couldn't get it done" much like we did with the invasion of Iraq.
It is two things. Energy/pipelines and Ukraine is a staging ground for a future war with Russia.Lets ask ourselves..why should we even be involved other than trying to prevent a humanitarian crisis? Is it oil and pipelines or other natural resources? It certainly cannot be some righteous "democracy" of the people while our own Feds are taking us into a totalitarian state.
The Russians are not a threat to Main Street USA.I used to be an isolationist growing up. I think the time for that policy has come and gone. We're far to interconnected nowadays to have a totally hands off foreign policy. The days of the vast oceans giving us protection has come and gone. Now I don't believe we should be sending military off to every conflict everywhere but the US can't become like the Swiss or the world would really go up in flames.