Not winning. 450 days and squat. Embiciles here we blood thirsty about this "offensive" which turns out may have been Ukraine flooding parts of they're country
Not winning. 450 days and squat. Embiciles here we blood thirsty about this "offensive" which turns out may have been Ukraine flooding parts of they're country
They may be. But where does this help them? Was Russia attacking in this area? Are there fights in this area that our MSM wasnt talking about? So that this floods out those attacks to save Ukraine?They are losing. And the media is running cover for them
And then there’s the fact that destroying the dam would have been far easier for Russia to pull off.They may be. But where does this help them? Was Russia attacking in this area? Are there fights in this area that our MSM wasnt talking about? So that this floods out those attacks to save Ukraine?
If there is a counteroffensive planned by Ukraine seems like this denies them an avenue of attack, or at the very least puts a pretty big delay on it if it was planned in this area. Allowing Russia to concentrate their forces away from this area.
Again it seems like you have to accept 5 different assumptions to believe it helps Ukraine. But you only have to accept 1 to believe it helps Russia.
Uhhh. That would be Russia who is losing by your definition. 450 days and squat.Not winning. 450 days and squat. Embiciles here we blood thirsty about this "offensive" which turns out may have been Ukraine flooding parts of they're country